Food and Nutrition Hazards Related to Public Health, Food Technology and Ecology: Perceptions of Experts and Non-experts in the United Kingdom
European Journal of Nutrition & Food Safety · pp. 166–178 · Published 17 Apr 2015
10.9734/EJNFS/2015/11161Abstract
Aim: This study investigated perceptions of risk to self, risk to society, risk denial, control, responsibility, trust and knowledge of food and nutrition-related hazards among expert and non-expert groups with an aim of better understanding barriers to effective communication between experts and the public. Design: Participants completed a questionnaire housed on an online platform. Methodology: Experts were recruited from nutritionists in the food industry in the UK. Non-experts were recruited from a voluntary public panel with access to the online platform. Questions documented demographic variables and scores for the risk that food and nutrition-related hazards pose to self and society. Participants scored perceptions of expert and personal control of hazards, personal responsibility for averting the hazards, trust in experts for managing the hazards and personal knowledge of the hazards. The hazards were categorised for analysis into public nutrition, food technology and food ecology to reflect degrees of citizen participation in risk management. Results: Experts scored perception of risk to self and risk to society from food technology hazards significantly lower than non-experts. Both groups had greatest risk denial, scores of personal control, personal responsibility and personal knowledge, and lowest scores for expert control, for public nutrition hazards. Trust in experts was higher among experts than it was among non-experts. Gender, personal responsibility and knowledge, but not trust in experts, were significant predictors of risk perception. Conclusions: There were similarities in perception of risk of public nutrition and food ecology hazards between experts and non-experts, but differences in the perception of risk and trust in experts relating to food technology. Both groups perceived higher personal control of and personal responsibility for, and lower expert control for, public nutrition hazards.
Cited by 1
1 citation reported by external sources — individual citing-article records aren't available to list yet.
Related research
- Assessment of Knowledge, Attitudes, and Consumption Patterns of Fortified Foods among Youth Population — shares topic coverage
- Investigating the Impact of Food Fortification on Micro-nutrient Content among Internally Displaced Children in Northeast Nigeria — shares topic coverage
- From Data to Diet: The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Nutritional Science — shares topic coverage
- Assessing the Nature of Risk Management Implementation in Manufacturing Small Medium Enterprises in Nigeria — shares topic coverage
- Knowledge, Risk Perception of Occupational Hazards and Safety Practices amongst Carpenters in Southern Nigeria: A Cross-sectional Study — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
18
Page views
0
PDF downloads
1
Outbound clicks
1
Citations
Views over time
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.