Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

Variability of Sensory Acceptance and Flavors of the Inflorescence Sap Deriving from Four Widespread Cultivars of Coconut (Cocos nucifera L.)

Konan N’Guessan Ysidor, Konan Konan Jean-Louis, Assa Rebecca Rachel, Biego Godi Henri Marius

Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology · pp. 1–10 · Published 17 Jul 2017

10.9734/CJAST/2017/33059

Abstract

Aims: The study focuses on the sensory properties of the coconut inflorescence sap for promoting its consumption by populations. Study Design: Four widespread coconut cultivars sampled, namely Malaysian Yellow Dwarf (MYD), West African Tall (WAT), and the improved hybrids MYD x WAT (PB121+) and Cameroon Red Dwarf x Rennel Island Tall (PB113+). Sap collected from young unopened inflorescences. Acceptance and descriptive sensory flavors variability of the sap samples assessed using 75 and 15 panelist tasters, respectively. Place and Duration of Study: Marc Delorme Research Station for Coconut (MDRSC), from the National Centre of Agronomic Research, Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire, between November 2014 and March 2015. Methodology: Six healthy adult coconut trees (over nine years of age) randomly selected from experimental plots of the MDRSC. Unopened inflorescences (of rank 8) selected per palm to produce the coconut sap. Coconut sap harvested twice a day and sap volumes gathered per cultivar and kept fresh into a freezer till the sensory assessment. The analyzes targeted the acceptance of the coconut sap samples from the consumers, then the estimation of the sweet, salty and sour sap flavors degrees using a 7 points rating scale. Data were collected through written rating after tasting trials achieved according to standard directives at the Technology Laboratory of the MDRSC, using 75 tasters for the hedonic characterization and 15 tasters for the sensory profile. Results: The tasting panelists enjoyed the coconut saps resulting from the 4 overall cultivars, but in various proportions ranging from 67.86% (WAT) to 92.86% (PB113+). The samples from WAT and PB113+ are more accepted, with full enjoyment mentioned by 48% and 62% panelists, respectively. The sweet flavor is felt with degrees ranging between 5.67/7 (PB113+) and 6.39/7 (MYD). The salty and sour flavors are felt with lower indexes oscillating between means of 2.03 and 3.21 from the 7 points rating scale. Conclusion: The MYD cultivar produces most sweetened sap whereas that of PB113+ hybrid is more appreciated for consumption. Both WAT and PB113+ cultivars could be promoted in coconut sap production for fresh drink. Besides, the sweeter sap of MYD and PB121+ could be processed into other coconut by-products such as vinegar, alcohol, syrup or coconut sugar.

Coconut sap cultivars hedonic acceptance flavors descriptive profile

Cited by 6

Formulation and Sensory Analysis of Cocktails Based on Ginger Oleoresin (Zingiber officinale Roscoe), Pineapple Juice (Ananas comosus L. MERR) and Bissap Concentrate (Hibiscus sabdariffa)

Adama Coulibaly, Pierre Ezoua, Ysidor N’guessan Konan, Souleymane Doukoure, Daouda Sidibe, Godi Henri Marius Biego · Journal of Applied Life Sciences International · 2021

Investigation in Sensory Properties of Liquid Extract Formulations Processed from Capsicum spp Varieties Sold in Abidjan

Sidibé Daouda, C. Adama, Nyamien Yves Bléouh Jean · Journal of Advances in Biology & Biotechnology · 2019

Development of a Method to Produce Granulated Sugar from the Inflorescences Sap of Coconut (Cocos nucifera L.) in Ivory Coast: Case of Hybrid PB113+

J. Muriel, K. K. Jean-Louis, R. Rebecca · Journal of Experimental Agriculture International · 2019

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

20

Page views

0

PDF downloads

3

Outbound clicks

6

Citations

Views over time

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.