Comparative Review of Wheat Flour and Cassava Flour: Potential of Fortified Cassava Flour as a Sustainable Substitute
Jumoke Happiness Ayansola, Roseline Oluwajomiloju Olateju, Ibrahim Abu, Oluwabunmi John, Teniola Atiwaye
Asian Journal of Food Research and Nutrition · pp. 1188–1204 · Published 25 Sep 2026
10.9734/ajfrn/2026/v5i4443Abstract
Wheat flour has exceptional bread-making functionality because hydrated gluten proteins form a cohesive, extensible gas-retaining network, but dependence on wheat can create economic and supply vulnerabilities in tropical regions where cassava is widely grown. Cassava flour offers high starch yield, agronomic resilience and opportunities for local value addition, yet conventional root flour is intrinsically low in protein and several micronutrients, lacks gluten, and requires effective control of cyanogenic compounds. This critical narrative review compares wheat flour and cassava flour and evaluates whether fortified cassava flour can function as a nutritionally adequate and environmentally defensible substitute. Literature published from January 2000 to 17 July 2026 was selected from multidisciplinary, agricultural, food-science and biomedical scholarly sources, with older standards and foundational evidence retained when necessary. The evidence indicates that cassava flour is not a universal drop-in replacement for wheat flour. In yeast-leavened bread, substitution commonly weakens dough rheology and loaf structure as wheat is displaced, although cassava variety, particle properties, heat-moisture treatment, fermentation, hydrocolloids and added gluten can materially alter performance. Nutritional fortification with soybean, mushroom or leafy-vegetable ingredients can raise protein or micronutrient density, while provitamin A biofortified cassava has human efficacy evidence for improving vitamin A status. These strategies, however, address different limitations and should not be treated as interchangeable. Sustainability claims are similarly conditional: cassava can support climate resilience, local sourcing and import substitution, but drying energy, transport of perishable roots, cultivation practices and processing infrastructure can dominate environmental performance. The most defensible pathway is therefore targeted, standards-based substitution in products and regions where cassava has a comparative agronomic or economic advantage, combined with nutrient fortification, cyanide control, functionality optimisation and life-cycle assessment. Fortified cassava flour has substantial potential as a partial wheat substitute and, in selected product categories, as a wheat-free base, but sustainability and nutritional adequacy must be demonstrated at the formulation and supply-chain levels rather than assumed from crop identity alone.
Cited by 0
No indexed citations yet.
Related research
- Amylolytic Potential of Lactic Acid Bacteria Isolated from Wet Milled Cereals, Cassava Flour and Fruits — shares topic coverage
- Economics of Cassava Flour Production in Iwajowa Local Government Area of Oyo State — shares topic coverage
- A Comparative Study on the Viscoelastic Properties of Wheat, Maize and Cassava Flours as Affected by Some Leguminous Seed Flours — shares topic coverage
- Effect of Variety and Harvesting Age on Physicochemical and Sensory Properties of Sweet-type Cassava Flour from South Lampung — shares topic coverage
- Comparative Studies on Homemade Bread Produced from Blends of Wheat Flour with Each of Cassava, Maize and Whole Wheat Flour — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
0
Page views
0
PDF downloads
0
Outbound clicks
0
Citations
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
No views recorded yet.
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
No traffic recorded yet.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.