Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

Comparative Review of Wheat Flour and Cassava Flour: Potential of Fortified Cassava Flour as a Sustainable Substitute

Jumoke Happiness Ayansola, Roseline Oluwajomiloju Olateju, Ibrahim Abu, Oluwabunmi John, Teniola Atiwaye

Asian Journal of Food Research and Nutrition · pp. 1188–1204 · Published 25 Sep 2026

10.9734/ajfrn/2026/v5i4443

Abstract

Wheat flour has exceptional bread-making functionality because hydrated gluten proteins form a cohesive, extensible gas-retaining network, but dependence on wheat can create economic and supply vulnerabilities in tropical regions where cassava is widely grown. Cassava flour offers high starch yield, agronomic resilience and opportunities for local value addition, yet conventional root flour is intrinsically low in protein and several micronutrients, lacks gluten, and requires effective control of cyanogenic compounds. This critical narrative review compares wheat flour and cassava flour and evaluates whether fortified cassava flour can function as a nutritionally adequate and environmentally defensible substitute. Literature published from January 2000 to 17 July 2026 was selected from multidisciplinary, agricultural, food-science and biomedical scholarly sources, with older standards and foundational evidence retained when necessary. The evidence indicates that cassava flour is not a universal drop-in replacement for wheat flour. In yeast-leavened bread, substitution commonly weakens dough rheology and loaf structure as wheat is displaced, although cassava variety, particle properties, heat-moisture treatment, fermentation, hydrocolloids and added gluten can materially alter performance. Nutritional fortification with soybean, mushroom or leafy-vegetable ingredients can raise protein or micronutrient density, while provitamin A biofortified cassava has human efficacy evidence for improving vitamin A status. These strategies, however, address different limitations and should not be treated as interchangeable. Sustainability claims are similarly conditional: cassava can support climate resilience, local sourcing and import substitution, but drying energy, transport of perishable roots, cultivation practices and processing infrastructure can dominate environmental performance. The most defensible pathway is therefore targeted, standards-based substitution in products and regions where cassava has a comparative agronomic or economic advantage, combined with nutrient fortification, cyanide control, functionality optimisation and life-cycle assessment. Fortified cassava flour has substantial potential as a partial wheat substitute and, in selected product categories, as a wheat-free base, but sustainability and nutritional adequacy must be demonstrated at the formulation and supply-chain levels rather than assumed from crop identity alone.

Cassava flour composite flour food fortification high-quality cassava flour bread quality biofortification life-cycle assessment wheat substitution

Cited by 0

No indexed citations yet.

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

0

Page views

0

PDF downloads

0

Outbound clicks

0

Citations

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

No views recorded yet.

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

No traffic recorded yet.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.