Evaluation of Different Indices of Sulfur Availability in Soils for Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Production in Ethiopia –II
Assefa Menna, Nyambilila Amuri, Tekalign Mamo, Johnson M. R. Semoka
International Journal of Plant & Soil Science · pp. 1–11 · Published 5 Sep 2015
10.9734/IJPSS/2015/20513Abstract
Using high-analysis fertilizers lacking adventitious sulfur (S), coupled with traditional cropping-systems that mine S from native soil, leads to S deficiency. However, under field conditions, S deficiency symptoms are not easily identifiable in cereals, because they are mistaken with those of Nitrogen (N). Hence, S availability indicators are necessary for rational fertilizer use. Eighteen explorative field experiments were conducted in 2012/2013 seasons in Central Highlands (HLs) of Ethiopia, with the purpose of evaluating S deficiency indicators in wheat, with the ultimate aim of setting critical-thresholds. In the study organic carbon (OC), and SO4-S in soils; total S and N/S ratio in grains were considered. Two levels of S (0 and 20 kg/ha); 2-levels of P (0 and 20 kg/ha); and 2-levels of N (0 and 69 kg/ha) as gypsum, triple-superphosphate (TSP) and urea, respectively were used. The experimental was laid out in randomized complete design (RCBD) in three replications. In the study, N/S ratio and S content in grain showed better association with S-uptake, with the degree of correlation, -0.83767 and 0.85547, respectively both significant at P<0.001. However, based on the minimum criteria set in literature, the total S in wheat grain showed better sensitivity, whereas N/S ratio was marginal. The critical-thresholds set at 90% Relative Yield (RY), were approximated to about 0.118% for total S, 14.7:1 for N/S ratio in grains; and 11.3 mg/kg for SO4-S in native soil. Therefore, wheat grains from S responsive sites and/or treatments can be distinguished from un-responsive ones, in which case much S response is expected for sites and/or treatments with total S content of <0.118%, N/S ratio >14.7:1 and SO4-S <11.3 mg/kg. In general, the results suggest that plant analysis, (in this case, grain), might be taken as a better tool for assessing S supply of soils or wheat crop than the soil analysis, and therefore, this preliminary result could be used as the basis for S research and as a provisional recommendation for wheat growers in Ethiopia.
Cited by 2
Walter D. Carciochi, Julián Mateos, Guillermo A. Divito · Soil Science Society of America Journal · 2019
Assefa Menna · Journal of Plant Nutrition · 2021
Related research
- Enhancing Bio-Available Phosphorous in Soil Through Sulfur Oxidation by Thiobacilli — shares topic coverage
- Characterization of Some Agricultural Soils: Presence and Activity of Tilemsi Rock Phosphate-Solubilizing Thiobacilli — shares topic coverage
- Effect of Soil Amendment Materials on Some of the Physicochemical Properties of Soil and Wheat Yield — shares topic coverage
- Degradation of Some Resistant Organic Compounds during Pressure Decomposition with Nitric Acid – Potassium Chlorate Reagent Solution — shares topic coverage
- Development of Liquid Fertilizers and Solid Soil Ameliorants from Staged Oxidation of Licorice Meal — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
0
Page views
0
PDF downloads
0
Outbound clicks
2
Citations
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
No views recorded yet.
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
No traffic recorded yet.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.