Prediction of Soil Colour using Vis-NIR Spectroscopy and Machine Learning Models
Devid Kumar Sahu, Y. M. Sharma, G. S. Tagore, P. S. Kulhare, R.K. Nema, R. K. Sahu
Asian Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition · pp. 657–676 · Published 17 Dec 2024
10.9734/ajsspn/2024/v10i4437Abstract
Soil colour is a critical indicator of soil properties and conditions, influencing various agronomic and environmental factors. A total of 2216 surface soil samples (0-15 cm) were collected from the Kymore Plateau and Satpura Hill zone of Madhya Pradesh, using Global Positioning System (GPS) for precise location. Soil colour parameters were measured in the field using the Munsell soil colour chart, while chemical analysis was conducted in the laboratory following standard procedures. Additionally, spectra of the soil samples were recorded using a spectroradiometer under laboratory conditions. The results showed that the soil colour hues ranged from 10R, 10YR, 2.5Y, 2.5YR, 5Y, 5R, 5YR, to 7.5YR, Values and Chroma varied from 2 to 7 and 1 to 8, respectively. Correlation analysis revealed negative correlations between the RGB components and organic carbon, with r values of -0.114**, -0.071**, and -0.101* for R, G, and B, respectively. Polynomial models showed the best fit for the relationship between the value and chroma of the colour parameters and soil organic carbon (SOC), with equations Y = 0.086x² - 0.860x + 7.528 (R² = 0.982) and Y = 0.018x² - 0.249x + 6.126 (R² = 0.948), respectively. A linear relationship was observed between chroma and available phosphorus (P), with the equation Y = -0.873 + 13.92 (R² = 0.922). In addition, machine learning models, including PLSR, SVM, Random Forest, ANN, XGBoost, LightGBM, CatBoost, and ELM algorithms, were used to predict soil colour parameters. Among these, the Random Forest and XGBoost models demonstrated the best performance in predicting soil colour parameters (L*, a*, b*, R, G, and B), with model accuracies of 83.6%, 80.9%, 83.0%, 84.3%, 83.7%, and 83.4%, respectively. soil colour variation depicted in the maps generated using GIS can also serve as covariates for mapping, offering comprehensive insights into the soil's properties.
Cited by 2
Gizachew Ayalew Tiruneh, Bhaskara Phaneendra, Ciro Abbud Righi · Geoderma Regional · 2026
Sadia Sabrin Nodi, Manoranjan Paul, Nathan Robinson · 2026
Related research
- Automatic Controlling System of Drip Irrigation Based on GSM — shares topic coverage
- Evaluation of Variation in Macronutrients of Soils in Harda District, Madhya Pradesh, India - A Geostatistical Approach — shares topic coverage
- Smart Fuel Monitoring for Agricultural Fleet Operations Using Tilt Sensors and Cloud Data Processing — shares topic coverage
- Transient Variations of Total Electron Content (TEC) Over a Terrestrial Point within Magnetic Anomaly Region — shares topic coverage
- GPS Cycle Slip Detection and Correction at Measurement Level — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
0
Page views
0
PDF downloads
0
Outbound clicks
2
Citations
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
No views recorded yet.
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
No traffic recorded yet.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.