Rooting Response of Rosa canina and Cotoneaster acuminatus to Different in vitro Factors
Rafail S. Toma, Layla S. M. Al-Mizory, Hadar S. Faizy
Journal of Experimental Agriculture International · pp. 724–731 · Published 25 Feb 2014
10.9734/AJEA/2014/8542Abstract
The current study aimed to test the direct rooting response of rose and cotoneaster explants collected in winter and spring and grown on different culture media including WPM, B5 and MS supplemented with different concentrations of IBA and NAA. The experiments were arranged according to Complete Randomized Design (CRD) and were conducted at the plant tissue culture laboratories of the Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Duhok, Iraq during the period between December 2012 and August 2013. The results showed that explants collected in winter and spring failed to root in both genotypes tested except cotoneaster explants collected in spring. The best rooting performance was found on those grown on WPM medium containing 0.1 mgl-1 IBA by giving 5.62 roots per explant and the longest roots reached to 4.42 cm. This root formation required 22 days from culture date. Concerning shoot multiplication parameters recorded for both plants during this study, rose explants taken in winter and grown on WPM medium containing 0.1 mgl-1 IBA gave the maximum number of shoot per explant reached to 2.62. The maximum number of shoots per explant for cotoneaster (3.0 shoots/ explant) was recorded when the explants were collected in spring and grown on WPM medium supplemented with 0.5mgl-1 IBA. WPM medium gave the longest shoots (6.98 cm) on rose explants collected in spring and supplemented with 0.5mgl-1IBA. MS medium supplemented with 0.5mgl-1IBA gave the longest cotoneaster shoots estimated at 3.37 cm which also recorded the highest number of leaves (13.87 leaves). The highest of leaves per explant of rose reached 21.75 leaves/ explant which were obtained on explants grown on WPM medium supplemented with 0.1mgl-1 IBA. It can be concluded that cotoneaster plant can be rooted directly from explants collected in spring season, whereas rose plant need to undergo the developmental stages of usual micropropagation protocols
Cited by 4
Ritika Dadhwal, S. Sharma, Somvir Singh · Scientific Reports · 2026
Maria Casanovas, E. Roca, Ramon Dolcet-Sanjuan · Plants · 2026
V. Kirillov, A. Pathak, Swati R. Patel · In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Plant · 2023
M. Serafimovich, V. Kirillov, T. Stikhareva · 2020
Related research
- Establishment of Regeneration and Transformation System of Lycopersicon esculentum MicroTom — shares topic coverage
- Isolation, Characterization and Antimicrobial Activity of Quercetin-3-O-(2”-α-Methyl-p-Coumaryl)-Rutinoside from Delonix elata Flowers — shares topic coverage
- Synthesis, Characterization and Biological Activity of New Amides Containing Azo Moieties — shares topic coverage
- Ascorbic Acid: A Prophylaxis Drug Therapy for Depression in Female Dam Rats — shares topic coverage
- Chemical Constituents from Wood of Zanthoxylum rigidum Hum. & Bonpl. Ex Willd (Rutaceae) and Antileishmanial Activity — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
0
Page views
0
PDF downloads
0
Outbound clicks
4
Citations
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
No views recorded yet.
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
No traffic recorded yet.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.