Discriminant and Multiple Linear Regression Analysis for Sex and Stature Estimation Using Upper Arm and Forearm-Hand Length: A Study among Mgbidi Population of Imo State Nigeria
Nicholas Asiwe, Oghenefego Michael Adheke, Ikechukwu Ezeah, Michael Okon, Patrick Leo Filima, Oweiwari Victor Buseni
Asian Journal of Medical Principles and Clinical Practice · pp. 295–305 · Published 3 Jun 2024
Abstract
Background: The key aspect of forensic anthropology is the estimation of biological profile characteristics such as sex, age, stature, etc. Its application is wide across various disciplines like forensic science, anthropology, archaeology, and medical sciences. The study aims to estimate sex and stature using upper arm and forearm-hand length among the Mgbidi population of Imo State, Nigeria. Methods: The study adopted a descriptive cross-sectional study design and a total of three hundred (150 males and 150 females) subjects were recruited for the study using multistage random sampling techniques. Data were obtained via direct measurements using mega-size calipers and a stadiometer. The obtained data was analyzed using IBM SPSS (version 25). Results: The study shows that males are significantly higher in anthropometric values (p<0.05) than females. The multivariate regression among the sexes to estimate Stature using the right side anthropometry shows R=0.62 and SEE= 6.45 and on the left side anthropometry; R=0.61 and SEE=6.49. the stature predictive power of females was (R=0.52, 52.0% SEE= 5.35) and males (R=0.46, 46.0%, SEE=5.51) on the right and left side anthropometry shows females (R=0.49, 49.0%, SEE=5.42) and males was (R=0.45, 45.0%, SEE=5.72). the estimation for sex shows overall significance (X2=72.78, ƛ= 0.78, R=0.46, p<0.05) from the right side and the left side also shows significance in sexual estimation (X2= 71.84, ƛ=0.79, R=0.46, p<0.05). Conclusion: The study reveals statistical differences in the upper arm and forearm-hand length compared to the sexes. Females are better predictors of stature using the upper arm and forearm-hand length than males and upper arm and forearm-hand length are good predictors of sex.
Cited by 0
No indexed citations yet.
Related research
- Estimating Tibia Length: An Anatomical Landmarks Evaluation of Bones and X-ray Radiographs — shares topic coverage
- Soil Vulnerability Assessment of Afikpo South Local Government Area, Ebonyi State, Nigeria — shares topic coverage
- On General Mathematical Constraints Applying to the Kinetics of Species Discovery during Progressive Sampling: Consequences on the Theoretical Expression of the Species Accumulation Curve — shares topic coverage
- Estimation of Maximum Cycle Temperature and Pressure Ratio for Optimum Design and Operations of Gas Turbine Power Plant — shares topic coverage
- Competitive Biodiversity of Human and Vascular Plant Species: The Implications for Pharmaceutical Industries, Health and World Economy Part- 2 — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
0
Page views
0
PDF downloads
0
Outbound clicks
0
Citations
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
No views recorded yet.
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
No traffic recorded yet.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.