Participatory Evaluation and Field Demonstration of Forage Varieties in Ondere Kebele, Dhagahmadow District, Somali Region, Ethiopia
Abdi Mohamed Ali, Mahamed Dol Ateye, Abdimalik Ali Ibrahim
Advances in Research · pp. 154–161 · Published 9 May 2025
10.9734/air/2025/v26i31333Abstract
Background: Livestock productivity in agro-pastoral systems is often constrained by feed shortages, which limits animal growth, reproduction, and overall production. Developing and integrating improved forage crops is a key strategy to address this challenge and enhance sustainable livestock feed availability. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate and demonstrate the performance of improved forage crops under rainfed conditions in agro-pastoralist areas, with a focus on their growth characteristics, biomass yield, and agro-pastoralists perceptions to facilitate adoption. Methods: The study was conducted in the Degahmadow district, Jarar zone, Somali Regional State, Ethiopia, using a participatory approach involving 25 community members, including women, under the PAPREG/PRG initiative. Agronomic practices, including land preparation, sowing, and forage management, were implemented following standard recommendations. Participatory variety evaluation and field demonstrations were conducted to assess species performance based on agropastoralist selection criteria. Results: The analysis of variance showed significant species differences in key growth parameters such as crop emergence, days to flowering, plant height, herbage yield, and days to first harvest. Sudan grass and Panicum maximum had similar emergence rates (3.44 and 3.37 days, respectively), while Chloris gayana (Rhodes grass) was significantly delayed by 4 days. Rhodes grass also had the longest time to flowering (53.9 days), whereas Panicum maximum (35.8 days) and Sudan grass (38.3 days) matured earlier. Fresh biomass yields ranged from 13 to 23 tons per hectare per harvest, with no significant yield difference between Sudan grass (7.56 tons per hectare) and Panicum maximum (7.43 tons per hectare). However, Rhodes grass recorded significantly lower dry matter yield. Sudan grass had the greatest plant height, though not significantly different from Panicum maximum, and both were significantly taller than Rhodes grass. The optimal harvesting date was significantly earlier for Panicum maximum (57 days) compared to Sudan grass (78 days) and Rhodes grass (74 days). Conclusion: Agro-pastoralists ranked Sudan grass highest due to its superior biomass yield, early maturity, ease of establishment, multiple harvest potential, and adaptability to environmental stresses, followed by Panicum maximum. The close alignment between agro-pastoralists preferences and scientific findings highlights the potential for integrating improved forage varieties into local livestock systems. This study underscores the importance of participatory approaches in forage development, promoting adoption and enhancing feed security in agro-pastoral communities.
Cited by 0
No indexed citations yet.
Related research
- Influence of a Silvopastoral System on Anatomical Aspects and Dry Matter Quality of Mombasa and Marandu Grasses — shares topic coverage
- Anti-Inflammatory Activity of Ethanol Root Extract of Panicum maximum — shares topic coverage
- Establishment of a Simple Plant Regeneration System Using Callus from Apomictic and Sexual Seeds of Guinea Grass (Panicum maximum) — shares topic coverage
- Growth Response of Guinea Grass (Panicum maximum) to Cutting Height and Poultry Manure — shares topic coverage
- Initial Development of Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) under Weed Competition with Different Species of Grasses — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
11
Page views
0
PDF downloads
0
Outbound clicks
0
Citations
Views over time
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.