Optimising Fodder Maize Productivity across Soil Fertility Gradients: A Critical Review of Soil Test Crop Response Strategies for Sustainable Nutrient Management
Priya Maria Jacob, S. Visveswaran, B. Rani, B. Aparna, S. Sarada, Pratheesh P. Gopinath
International Journal of Plant & Soil Science · pp. 106–124 · Published 19 Sep 2026
10.9734/ijpss/2026/v38i106335Abstract
Fodder maize (Zea mays L.) is a high-biomass, nutrient-responsive forage whose economic value depends on both harvested mass and nutritive quality. Fertiliser recommendations based on regional averages can therefore be inefficient when fields differ markedly in native nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium supply, organic matter, pH, texture, previous management and residual fertility. This critical narrative review evaluates soil test crop response (STCR) and related targeted-yield strategies as a basis for improving fodder maize nutrient management across soil fertility gradients. Literature published principally from January 2010 to 26 June 2026 was considered, with older foundational methodological sources retained where necessary. The evidence shows that STCR offers a defensible framework because fertiliser rates are adjusted to a yield target and to measured soil nutrient supply rather than applied as a uniform dose. Maize studies across Alfisols, Vertisols, Inceptisols and related soils generally demonstrate improved target attainment, nutrient-use efficiency or economic performance when calibrated STCR or STCR-integrated plant nutrient supply approaches are compared with blanket recommendations. Nevertheless, transfer to fodder maize remains less secure than the broader maize literature suggests. Direct fodder studies confirm strong interactions among nitrogen rate, plant density, zinc supply, water regime, cultivar and harvest endpoint, while recent fodder-specific STCR work shows that deliberate fertility gradients can be established in lateritic soils. Yet contemporary multi-location validation of fodder-specific target equations, dry-matter removal, feed-quality safeguards, residual nutrient credits and environmental outcomes is still limited. The most defensible pathway is therefore an STCR-plus strategy: locally calibrated pre-season soil-test prescriptions, explicit organic nutrient credits, and in-season nitrogen adjustment using crop sensing, with potassium and micronutrient balance evaluated against whole-plant removal. Future research should prioritise multi-soil calibration and external validation using green-fodder yield, dry-matter yield, nutritive quality, nutrient recovery, profitability and soil nutrient balance as joint outcomes. STCR can support sustainable fodder maize intensification, but its reliability depends on calibration domain, measurement quality and repeated validation rather than on universal transfer of published equations.
Cited by 0
No indexed citations yet.
Related research
- Site-specific Nutrient Management in Maize Tract of Khammam-based on STCR and Targeted Yield Approach — shares topic coverage
- Optimizing Nutrient Recommendations for Bottle Gourd Crop by Formulation of Targeted Yield Equations in an Inceptisol of Odisha, India — shares topic coverage
- Impact of Different Approaches of Nutrient Recommendations for Aerobic Rice on Soil Fertility of Alfisols of Eastern Dry Zone of Karnataka — shares topic coverage
- Recalibration of Targeted Yield Equations through Integrated Plant Nutrition System for Greengram (Vigna radiata L.) on Alfisol — shares topic coverage
- Nutrient Management for Targeted Yield for the Groundnut Crop in Lateritic Soils — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
23
Page views
0
PDF downloads
4
Outbound clicks
0
Citations
Views over time
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.