Corporate Governance Mechanism and Financial Ratios on the Indonesia Stock Exchange: How do they Affect Financial Distress?
Siti Nur Hajaroh, Ika Yustina Rahmawati, Wida Purwidianti, Totok Haryanto
Asian Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting · pp. 81–96 · Published 6 Jan 2024
10.9734/ajeba/2024/v24i11213Abstract
Aims: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of institutional ownership, board of directors, audit committee, company size, and sales growth on financial distress. Study Design: The population of this study consisted of 41 retail subsector companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) for the 2019-2022 period. The total observation data is 164 and obtained 64 data samples that meet the criteria and 100 data samples that do not meet the criteria (Loss, Gray Area, Incomplete variables). This research data comes from the company's annual financial statements. Methodology: The data collection method is purposive sampling and the analysis technique is model fit test, coefficient of determination test, and logistic regression. Financial distress is calculated using the Altman Z-Score calculation, and hypothesis testing is tested using the SPSS 26 analysis tool. Results: The results showed that good corporate governance proxied by the board of directors and audit committee has no effect on financial distress, while institutional ownership affects financial distress. Company size variables affect financial distress. While sales growth has no effect on financial distress. Conclusion: Based on this study, it is known that institutional ownership has an effect on financial distress, meaning that the greater the percentage of institutional ownership will reduce the possibility of the company experiencing financial distress. The board of directors has no effect on financial distress, meaning that the number of directors in a company does not affect the occurrence of financial distress. The audit committee has no effect on financial distress, meaning that the number of audit committee members is not able to reduce the problem of financial distress. Company size has an effect on financial distress, meaning that a higher total asset value owned by company would reduce the probability of financial distress. Sales growth has no effect on financial distress, meaning that the high or low level of sales growth does not reflect that it can be followed by an increase in profits earned by the company. To avoid financial distress, it is done by higher percentage of institutional ownership, as well higher total asset value owned by the company properly.
Cited by 2
Erika Alviani, B. Syahzuni · Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Politala · 2025
Shafira Deswita Sari, F. Kristanti · JURNAL AKUNTANSI DAN BISNIS Jurnal Program Studi Akuntansi · 2024
Related research
- Corporate Governance and Corporate Fraud: An Examination of Interaction Effects in Nigeria — shares topic coverage
- The Extent of Applying the International Internal Audit Standards by the Telecommunication Companies Operating in Jordan — shares topic coverage
- Effect of Audit Committee Characteristics on the Timeliness of Financial Reporting in Nigeria — shares topic coverage
- Audit Committee Characteristics and Corporate Governance Disclosure of Nigerian Deposit Money Banks — shares topic coverage
- Impact of Corporate Governance Mechanism in Mitigating Creative Accounting Practice of Listed Conglomerate Companies in Nigeria — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
0
Page views
0
PDF downloads
0
Outbound clicks
2
Citations
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
No views recorded yet.
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
No traffic recorded yet.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.