Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

Proximate and Antinutrient Compositions of Potato (Solanum tuberosum) Tuber from Selected Storage Methods

Thomas A. Okache, Olayinka R. Karim, Adegbola O. Dauda, Victor E. Edem, Oladimeji S. Kamaldeen

Asian Journal of Food Research and Nutrition · pp. 293–305 · Published 25 Mar 2025

10.9734/ajfrn/2025/v4i2245

Abstract

Aims: To evaluate the effects of four storage methods consisting of pit storage (PS), room storage (RS), metal-in-block evaporative cooling system (EC), and charcoal cooling chamber (CC) on the chemical composition of potato (Solanum tuberosum L) tuber. Study Design: The study employed a randomized complete block design involving these four storage methods. 4.8-5.0 kg of potato from the various storage methods were analyzed fortnightly for 8 weeks, while a set of fresh potato without blemish and storage served as the control. Methodology: The proximate and antinutrient compositions of stored potato were assessed using standard methods, data obtained were subjected to analysis of variance, and means were separated using Duncan multiple range test. Results: The findings of this study were that; storage methods had significant effects (P<0.05) on the proximate composition of potatoes during storage in various storage techniques as potatoes from these storages varied in moisture content (59.25-82.98%), ash content (0.78-0.64%), crude protein (1.34-2.06%), and total carbohydrate content (13.23-37.61%). The antinutrient composition also ranged from 2.85-5.56 mg/100g (phenols), 1.31-1.72 mg/100g (cyanide), 5.73-6.91 mg/100g (saponnins), 1.63-3.82 mg/100g (alkaloids), and 1.22-1.93 mg/100g (tannins).   Conclusion: The study concluded that the chemical composition of potato was significantly influenced by the different storage methods, and the EC and CC were the most effective methods for potato storage. The study, therefore recommended CC for adoption based on its nutrient retention and affordability.

Chemical potato phytochemicals quality storage techniques

Cited by 2

Showing 1 of 2 known citations — external sources report more than can currently be individually listed.

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

0

Page views

0

PDF downloads

0

Outbound clicks

2

Citations

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

No views recorded yet.

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

No traffic recorded yet.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.