Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

Library and Information Science (LIS) Education and Library Practice in India: Bridging the Gap or Deepening the Divide?

M.S. Girish Rathod

Asian Research Journal of Arts & Social Sciences · pp. 34–41 · Published 16 Jun 2025

10.9734/arjass/2025/v23i7724

Abstract

Library and Information Science (LIS) education in India faces a widening gap between academic instruction and professional practice, hindering the development of a workforce equipped to meet contemporary library demands. This study aims to examine the systemic factors behind this disconnect and evaluate whether current LIS education bridges or deepens this divide.  By evaluating regulatory challenges, entrenched academic structures, and the absence of structured industry-academia collaborations, the research highlights the need for curricular reform, interdisciplinary integration, and ongoing professional development. Drawing insights from comparative studies, case analyses, and policy frameworks, this article proposes actionable strategies to realign LIS education with evolving technological and professional requirements. Establishing standardized accreditation systems, fostering hands-on learning experiences, and redefining faculty roles are essential to bridging the divide and ensuring LIS graduates are well-prepared for the future of library services in India.

LIS education library professionals teaching–practitioner divide curriculum reform digital librarianship

Cited by 0

No indexed citations yet.

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

0

Page views

0

PDF downloads

0

Outbound clicks

0

Citations

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

No views recorded yet.

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

No traffic recorded yet.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.