Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

The Phosphocreatine-ATP Energy Shuttle and Muscle Action: Misconceptions, Oversights and Insights

Sosale Chandrasekhar

International Journal of Biochemistry Research & Review · pp. 1–6 · Published 4 Jul 2017

10.9734/IJBCRR/2017/34643

Abstract

The role of phosphocreatine (PC) as an ‘energy buffer’ in muscular contraction needs to be reassessed from several viewpoints. In particular, the view that the hydrolysis of PC is more exergonic than that of ATP is erroneous, as the enthalpy and Gibbs free energy changes (respectively) have generally been compared. (Apparently, the reactions are about equally exergonic.) Even so, the question of how PC levels build up during the rest phase at the expense of ATP remains. Also, in a general sense, the need for PC is intriguing in itself, as its presence can be obviated by maintaining sufficient levels of ATP. Plausible explanations are proposed for these apparent conundrums.        

Actin ATP creatine muscle myosin phosphocreatine phosphoryl transfer

Cited by 0

No indexed citations yet.

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

0

Page views

0

PDF downloads

0

Outbound clicks

0

Citations

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

No views recorded yet.

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

No traffic recorded yet.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.