Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

Influence of Strain on Production and Some Other Traits of Indigenous Guinea Fowls (Numida meleagris) in Ghana

A. Duodu, S. Y. Annor, J. K. Kagya-Agyemang, C. G. Kyere

Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology · pp. 1–7 · Published 29 Oct 2018

10.9734/CJAST/2018/44123

Abstract

This study was conducted to investigate the influence of strain on production traits, egg fertility, hatchability, dressing percentage, survival and docility of indigenous Guinea fowls in Ghana. A total of 700 keets (F1 generation) hatched from four strains of indigenous Guinea fowls were randomly picked from a large population at a day old and reared for 32 weeks. At 8th weeks, after mating, 600 keets (300 males and 300 females) were used for the study. The birds were separated into four strains (Pearl, Lavender, White and Black). Based on their numbers, the Pearls were replicated ten times, both Lavender and White five times each and the Black four times in a completely randomise design. There were 25 birds per replicate. In total there were 250 Pearls (125 males and 125 females), 125 Lavenders (62 males and 63 females), 125 Whites (63 males and 62 females) and 100 Blacks (50 males and 50 females). Data were analysed using the General Linear Model (GLM) procedure of SAS. The results showed that at 8th week the Pearl and the White had significantly (p<0.05) higher body weight and daily weight gain. However, at 16th, 24th and 32th week body weight was significantly (p<0.05) highest in Pearl strain. Age at first egg was significantly (p<0.05) earlier in the Lavender than the Pearl, White and Black but delayed in the Pearl. Again, the Pearls were significantly (p<0.05) superior in egg weight, percentage hen day egg production and fertility. No significant differences were observed in post-brooding daily weight gain, feed intake, FCR, docility by heterophil/lymphocyte ratio and post-brooding survival of the strains. Hatchability was significantly (p<0.05) higher in the Black. The White strain had significantly (p<0.05) better dressing percentage. Pre-brooding survival was significantly (p<0.05) higher in the Pearls and lower in the Black. Lavender was docile (p<0.05) as compared to the other breeds. It was concluded that given the same treatment, the Pearl strain had the potential to perform fairly well in most of the traits studied, hence are recommended for higher production while the Black strain should be used for hatchability and the Lavender for docility improvement.

Survival body weight reproduction docility traits

Cited by 6

Effect of Season and Dietary <i>Moringa oleifera</i> Leaf Meal on Growth Performance of the Pearl Guinea Fowl

Patrick Atta Poku Jr., James K. Kagya, Fritz R.K. Bonsu · Pakistan Journal of Nutrition · 2023

Morpho-Biometric Characterization of Indigenous Guinea fowl (Numida meleagris) Populations in Northern Togo

A.E. Soara, E. Talaki, G-K. Dayo · International Journal of Poultry Science · 2020

Effect of Seasonality and Dietary Moringa oleifera Leaf Meal on the Quality of Spermatozoa of the Pearl Guinea Fowl Cock

Patrick Poku Jr., James Kagya-Agye, Fritz Bonsu · International Journal of Poultry Science · 2023

FACTORS AFFECTING PRODUCTIVE PERFORMANCE OF GUINEA FOWL: A REVIEW

Rodrigo Portillo Salgado, Jaime Bautista Ortega, Alfonso J. Chay Canul · Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems · 2022

Growth and Laying Performance of Local Guinea Fowl on Different Dietary Protein and Energy Levels

Olasunkanmi Peter Olajide, Olayinka Alabi, Abang Cyril · Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi · 2024

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

5

Page views

0

PDF downloads

0

Outbound clicks

6

Citations

Views over time

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.