Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

Improving Communication Style Awareness in a Teacher Preparation Program

Sandy S. Venneman, Jane Devick Fry, Mary Mayaorga

Journal of Education, Society and Behavioural Science · pp. 10–19 · Published 9 Sep 2014

10.9734/BJESBS/2015/12345

Abstract

Aims: Teacher communication can positively or negatively influence student performance. The ability to be flexible in style increases successful communication but requires a high degree of self-awareness. The purpose of this initial investigation was two fold. First, to examine potential shifts in student teacher’s preferred communication styles dependent upon participation in a Communication Styles Workshop using an existing program (HRDQ). Second, to initiate a dialogue regarding a potential need to infuse Communication Styles awareness into educator preparation program curricula. Study Design: A quazi-experimental design approved by the University of Houston-Victoria Human Subjects Committee was used to determine if participants changed their communication style preference after exploring the benefits of different styles. Place and Duration of Study: Two sections of a teacher preparation program conducted at two locations near Houston Texas were employed to create the experimental and control groups. Methodology: Forty-six student teachers (37 female, 3 male, 6 unspecified, ages 20-60) participated in intact groups, one being the experimental and the second the control group. The Communication Styles Assessment (HRDQ) defined participant’s communication styles the start (pre-test) and end (post-test) of a semester. The experimental group participated in a series of exercises exploring communication styles while the control group participated in the regular curriculum. Results: Two-tailed paired sample t-tests (p<.05) were employed to examine pre to post-test preference differences for communication style preferences with-in groups. A significant increase in the preference for the most beneficial style (t=2.05 (df 24) p=.05 and a significant decrease in preference for the least efficacious style t=2.35 (df 24) p=.03 was seen in the experimental group, but not in the control group. Conclusion: Higher education educator preparation programs should consider infusion of research-based communication curriculum into coursework that may help encourage a classroom environment supportive of learning and student achievement.

Communication style educator preparationc classroom climate student-teacher relationship quazi-experiment.

Cited by 2

Students’ Communication Styles in Speaking Class at Universitas PGRI Sumatera Barat

M. Ikhsan, Siska Siska, Yelliza Yelliza · JUPE : Jurnal Pendidikan Mandala · 2024

STUDENTS' COMMUNICATION STYLE IN SPEAKING CLASS AT STKIP PGRI SUMATERA BARAT

M. Ikhsan · Journal of Asian Studies: Culture, Language, Art and Communications · 2021

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

8

Page views

0

PDF downloads

0

Outbound clicks

2

Citations

Views over time

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.