Implementation Challenges and Effectiveness of National Reading Programs: Their Influence on Persistent Reading Difficulties among Key Stage 1 Learners
Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies · pp. 7–20 · Published 14 Sep 2026
10.9734/ajess/2026/v52i103337Abstract
This study examined the implementation challenges and effectiveness of national reading programmes and their relationship with persistent reading difficulties among Key Stage 1 learners in selected public elementary schools in one district of the Schools Division of Lanao del Norte, Philippines, during School Year 2025-2026. Specifically, it described the teacher-respondents' profile; determined the levels of programme implementation, implementation challenges, and perceived effectiveness; examined CRLA BoSY and EoSY classifications; tested significant changes, relationships, and predictors using available school-level CRLA data; and developed an action plan responsive to the findings. The null propositions tested at the 0.05 level assumed no significant relationships or predictive effects among the variables addressed by the available inferential data. Employing a quantitative descriptive-correlational design with predictive analysis, the study involved 30 teacher-respondents directly engaged in foundational literacy instruction and reading intervention. Data were collected through a researcher-made questionnaire assessing programme implementation, implementation challenges, and perceived effectiveness. These data were complemented by aggregated Comprehensive Rapid Literacy Assessment (CRLA) Beginning-of-School-Year (BoSY) and End-of-School-Year (EoSY) records for Grades 1 to 3. Descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, paired-samples t-tests, Pearson correlations, simple and multiple regression, and odds-ratio analysis were used. Findings showed Very High levels of programme implementation (M = 4.54) and perceived effectiveness (M = 4.64), alongside Very High implementation challenges (M = 4.34). Across the pooled CRLA records, the proportion of learners Reading at Grade Level increased from 12.09% at BoSY to 48.51% at EoSY, while Low Emerging Readers decreased from 38.03% to 5.16%. Reading classifications differed significantly across assessment periods, χ²(4, N = 8,247) = 2121.19, p < .001, Cramér's V = 0.507. At the school level, mean persistent reading difficulty declined from 86.12% to 48.54%, while BoSY severe/early difficulty significantly predicted EoSY persistent difficulty. These findings indicate substantial literacy gains across the implementation period, although a considerable proportion of learners remained below grade-level expectations at year-end. The results underscore the need for sustained teacher capacity-building, differentiated remediation, protected intervention time, adequate reading resources, CRLA-informed instructional supervision, and stronger home-school partnerships.
Cited by 0
No indexed citations yet.
Related research
- The MMDA Program (Mmmm Makakabasa Din Ako): A Reading Intervention for the Primary Learners at Guinamgamman Elementary School — shares topic coverage
- The BEAR (Be Excited About Reading) Intervention Program: Its Impact on The Reading Skills of Learners — shares topic coverage
- Effectiveness of Reading Comprehension Interventions in the Philippines’ Multilingual Context: A Systematic Review — shares topic coverage
- The Use of Interactive Workbook in Improving Reading in English among Grade 4 Pupils: A Developmental Research — shares topic coverage
- Development of Foundational Literacy and Numeracy Skill among Primary School Students: Theoretical Analysis of Gender and Parental Role — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
33
Page views
0
PDF downloads
13
Outbound clicks
0
Citations
Views over time
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.