Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

From Fragmented Protective Practices to Secure Digital Learning: Developing the Secure-Dl Cybersecurity Adoption Framework for Higher Education

Shamsuddeen Mohammed Sada, Nnenna Harmony Nwobodo-Nzeribe, Adesegun Nurudeen Osijirin

Asian Journal of Research in Computer Science · pp. 142–153 · Published 14 Oct 2026

10.9734/ajrcos/2026/v19i10924

Abstract

Digital learning depends on students consistently applying several layers of cybersecurity protection, yet higher-education interventions often rely on general awareness messages or isolated technical training. This study developed an evidence-informed, theory-integrated framework for moving students from fragmented protective practices towards secure digital learning. Primary survey data were obtained from 393 Computer Science undergraduates in universities in Enugu State, Nigeria, using the 60-item Utilisation of Cybersecurity Applications for Digital Learning Questionnaire. Five domains were assessed: antivirus, firewall and intrusion detection/prevention, encryption, multi-factor authentication (MFA), and virtual private network (VPN) use. Domain means were benchmarked against the prespecified functional criterion of 2.50 using one-sample tests and standardised mean differences. Empirical gaps were then mapped to mechanisms from Social Cognitive Theory, the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology, and Protection Motivation Theory, and aligned with multilevel implementation principles. All five domains were below the functional benchmark. Antivirus use was closest to the criterion (M=2.36, SD=0.57, d=-0.24), whereas firewall (M=2.07, d=-0.59), encryption (M=2.08, d=-0.60), MFA (M=2.12, d=-0.58), and VPN use (M=2.10, d=-0.61) showed moderate deficits. The resulting SECURE-DL framework comprises six linked functions: Screen and segment; Enable secure defaults; Cultivate capability; Use threat-and-coping messages; Reinforce norms and feedback; and Evaluate and adapt. It specifies actions at the student, course/programme, and institutional levels, together with process, behavioural, and resilience indicators. The framework shifts cybersecurity education from awareness-only provision towards supported, repeated, and measurable protective practice. Prospective testing is required before causal effectiveness or generalisability can be established.

Cybersecurity adoption digital learning higher education protective behaviour implementation framework social cognitive theory protection motivation theory

Cited by 0

No indexed citations yet.

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

0

Page views

0

PDF downloads

0

Outbound clicks

0

Citations

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

No views recorded yet.

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

No traffic recorded yet.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.