Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

Evaluation of Gherkin (Cucumis anguria L.) Genotypes for Yield and Quality Traits

Deepika, Shivayogi Y. Ryavalad, Raveendra S Jawadagi, Bapurayagouda Bagavantagouda Patil, Sanganabasav G Gollagi, Hanumanthappa Parappa Hadimani

Journal of Advances in Biology & Biotechnology · pp. 158–166 · Published 12 Dec 2024

10.9734/jabb/2024/v27i121763

Abstract

Genetic variability in a crop population is essential for successful plant breeding. The morphological characterization of gherkin studies has received relatively little attention. This investigation was conducted during the Rabi season, 2022, at the University of Horticulture Sciences, Bagalkot aims to study morphological variation among seven gherkin genotypes. Davangere Local was superior with in terms of vine length at 30, 60 and final harvest (0.66 m, 1.57 m, and 2.37 m, respectively), primary branches per vine (6.13), nodes per vine (24.00) and intermodal length (8.45 cm). It also excelled in the appearance of first female flower (15.10 days), days to first harvest (23.00 days), number of fruits per vine (125.29) and fruit yield per vine (0.61 kg). In terms of quality parameters, Chandini exhibited highest total soluble solids (5.50 °B). While Kadur Local showcased highest ascorbic acid (26.60 mg/100 g). Davangere Local shows the highest crude fiber content (19.56%). In conclusion, Davangere Local demonstrated overall superiority.

Gherkin genetic variability morphological characterization yield and quality parameters

Cited by 0

No indexed citations yet.

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

0

Page views

0

PDF downloads

0

Outbound clicks

0

Citations

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

No views recorded yet.

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

No traffic recorded yet.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.