Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 3.0

Effects of Progress Monitoring on Math Performance of At-Risk Students

Richard Lambert, Bob Algozzine, Jennifer Mc Gee

Journal of Education, Society and Behavioural Science · pp. 527–540 · Published 14 Jan 2014

10.9734/BJESBS/2014/7259

Abstract

Aims: In this research, we evaluated the effects of progress monitoring grounded in a commercially-available tool used to customize assignments and keep track of progress in mathematics for students in elementary school. Study Design: We used a randomized controlled trial and multilevel analysis to test the effect of the treatment on the outcome measures while nesting students within their classroom. Place and Duration of Study: Students in three elementary schools in the Midwestern region of the United States were in the study which took place across an academic year. Methodology: We used two-level hierarchical linear models for our analyses because of the nested nature of our data. We compared outcomes across high- and low-implementation fidelity treatment group classrooms as well as across treatment and control classrooms. Results: We found statistically significant treatment differences for monthly growth rate and elementary school fidelity of implementation effects were documented. Conclusion: Professionals engaged in progress monitoring use a variety of measures to track student performance and to assist in instructional decision making when data indicate a need for change. We found that the use of a computer-based individualized mathematics assignment and progress monitoring program resulted in improvements in both curriculum-based and standardized assessments. The effects of using the system were greater when level of implementation (i.e., intervention fidelity) was higher. The value of progress monitoring and the importance of measuring the relationship between fidelity of implementation and achievement outcomes that we found support prior research.

Progress monitoring curriculum-based measurement mathematics

Cited by 5

Characteristics of Effective Elementary Mathematics Instruction: A Scoping Review of Experimental Studies

Branko Bognar, Sanela Mužar Horvat, Ljerka Jukić Matić · Education Sciences · 2025

Optimized Screening for At-Risk Students in Mathematics: A Machine Learning Approach

Okan Bulut, Damien C. Cormier, Seyma Nur Yildirim-Erbasli · Information · 2022

Review of computer‐based assessment for learning in elementary and secondary education

V.J. Shute, S. Rahimi · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · 2017

Effective Programs in Elementary Mathematics: A Meta-Analysis

Marta Pellegrini, Cynthia Lake, Amanda Neitzel · AERA Open · 2021

Implementation fidelity and attainment in computerized practice of mathematics

Keith J. Topping · Research Papers in Education · 2019

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

19

Page views

0

PDF downloads

0

Outbound clicks

5

Citations

Views over time

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.