Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

Difficult but Valuable! Learning in Student-centered Assessment Feedback Practices in Higher Education

Maunumäki Minna, Maunula Minna, Harju-Luukkainen Heidi

Journal of Education, Society and Behavioural Science · pp. 20–37 · Published 7 Oct 2022

10.9734/jesbs/2022/v35i1130467

Abstract

Aims: The aim of this study is to fill a gap in research on students' experiences of learning in student-centered assessment feedback practices. The article examines what students tell us about their learning in the context of student-centered feedback practices in higher education during online learning. Study Design: The study was conducted as a qualitative online survey among Finnish university students (N=35). The relationship between learning and assessment was explored in the context of formative and summative assessment practices during an online learning environment. The data was analysed using a discursive approach. Place and Duration of Study: The research was conducted in Finland during spring 2021. Methodology: The scientific and philosophical framework of the study is based on the theory of social constructionism, according to which social reality is formed through language in an interaction between people. The methodology used was discursive reading, i.e., how social reality is discursively produced through language. The starting point was the idea that language creates different discourses or perspectives on reality. Results: The feedback practices provided a different picture of learning and highlighted different dimensions of learning. Learning was discussed in terms of positive emotions, multiple perspectives, sociality, renewal, and holistic learning. In addition, negative emotions, disinformation, regression, and the playing field metaphor were associated with learning.  Conclusion: The results show that feedback practices that are presented as student-centered do not necessarily support the learning process of adults. Learning and assessment practices based on pedagogy and a learning theory can best support students' personal and social growth and increase their self-esteem. In online learning, teacher guidance and pedagogically based learning support are emphasized. We argue that in online-learning, where the role of the teacher is often small, student-centered well-intentioned assessment practices can only provide a thin veneer of learning unless students are helped to see the holistic importance of assessment as part of the learning process.

Assessment online learning higher education continuous learning

References (47)

  1. 1 Qualitative research and evaluation methods
  2. 2 Discourse and Social Change. [DOI]
  3. 3 Fourth-Generation Evaluation [DOI]
  4. 4 Teaching for quality learning at university
  5. 5 The development of student feedback literacy: enabling uptake of feedback [DOI]
  6. 6 Learning to Teach in Higher Education [DOI]
  7. 7 The methodology of evaluation
  8. 8 Rethinking models of feedback for learning: the challenge of design [DOI]
  9. 9 Sustainable Assessment: Rethinking assessment for the learning society [DOI]
  10. 10 Beyond feedback: developing student capability in complex appraisal [DOI]
  11. 11 Making Sense of Assessment Feedback in Higher Education [DOI]
  12. 12 Supporting Learners' Agentic Engagement With Feedback: A Systematic Review and a Taxonomy of Recipience Processes [DOI]
  13. 13 Developing evaluative judgement: enabling students to make decisions about the quality of work [DOI]
  14. 14 Peer Assessment [DOI]
  15. 15 Critical discourse analysis and critical policy studies [DOI]
  16. 16 Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice
  17. 17 Teacher feedback literacy and its interplay with student feedback literacy [DOI]
  18. 18 What makes for effective feedback: staff and student perspectives [DOI]
  19. 19 Analyzing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research [DOI]
  20. 20 Researching feedback dialogue: an interactional analysis approach [DOI]
  21. 21 Barriers to student active learning in higher education [DOI]
  22. 22 The need to disentangle assessment and feedback in higher education [DOI]
  23. 23 Assessment 2000: Towards a Pluralistic Approach to Assessment [DOI]
  24. 24 ‘Now that’s the feedback I want!’ Students’ reactions to feedback on graded work and what they do with it [DOI]
  25. 25 Factors explaining the learning of generic skills: a study of university students’ experiences [DOI]
  26. 26 Feeling feedback: students’ emotional responses to educator feedback [DOI]
  27. 27 Integrative assessment: reframing assessment practice for current and future learning [DOI]
  28. 28 Assessing agency of university students: validation of the AUS Scale [DOI]
  29. 29 Does student agency benefit student learning? A systematic review of higher education research [DOI]
  30. 30 A meta-review of the student role in feedback [DOI]
  31. 31 Student agency in feedback: beyond the individual [DOI]
  32. 32 Reframing assessment research: through a practice perspective [DOI]
  33. 33 Designing assessment in a digital world: an organising framework [DOI]
  34. 34 Patterns of resistance in managing assessment change [DOI]
  35. 35 Fairness as a multifaceted quality in classroom assessment [DOI]
  36. 36 ‘Finally studying for myself’ – examining student agency in summative and formative self-assessment models [DOI]
  37. 37 Students’ agency profiles in relation to student-perceived teaching practices in university courses [DOI]
  38. 38 Peer assessment as a learning and self-assessment tool: a look inside the black box [DOI]
  39. 39 Developing the relational in teacher feedback literacy: exploring feedback talk [DOI]
  40. 40 El futuro de la evaluación en la educación superior [DOI]
  41. 41 How is theory used in assessment and feedback research? A critical review [DOI]
  42. 42 Towards effective feedback: an investigation of teachers’ and students’ perceptions of oral feedback in classroom practice [DOI]
  43. 43 Assessment as Learning [DOI]
  44. 44 Characterising feedback cultures in higher education: an analysis of strategy documents from 134 UK universities [DOI]
  45. 45 Taxonomy of Educational Objectives [DOI]
  46. 46 A book review: Taylor Walsh, Unlocking the Gates: How and Why Leading Universities are Opening Up Access to their Courses, Higher Education: DOI:10.1007/s10734-011-9425-z. (Published by Springer, ISI Journal) [DOI]
  47. 47 Social Constructionism [DOI]

Cited by 6

Finnish Student Teachers’ Visions for the Future of Sustainable Teacher Education

Minna Maunula, Minna Maunumäki, Heidi Harju-Luukkainen · Rethinking Higher Education · 2025

Multidisciplinary learning assessment in Finland – a phenomenographic approach on teachers’ perceptions

Ulla Hietamäki, Heidi Harju-Luukkainen, Minna Maunula · Education 3-13 · 2024

Unlocking the potential of student teachers: a practical approach to promote competence development through competence standards

Annalena Steffen, Franziska Ohl · Cogent Education · 2024

Showing 3 of 6 known citations — external sources report more than can currently be individually listed.

Related research

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

6

Page views

0

PDF downloads

0

Outbound clicks

6

Citations

Views over time

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.