Cost-Economic Evaluation of Leafy Vegetable Harvester versus Conventional Harvesting: A Comparative Study
Ramineni Harsha Nag, P. K. Sharma, Indra Mani, H. L. Kushwaha, R. K. Yadav, Debashish Chakraborty, Susheel Kumar Sarkar, Ajay Kushwah
International Journal of Environment and Climate Change · pp. 3145–3153 · Published 7 Aug 2023
10.9734/ijecc/2023/v13i92558Abstract
The process of harvesting green vegetables is labor-intensive and costly, demanding a substantial workforce. To address the challenges associated with manual harvesting, mechanization is essential for reducing costs, saving time, and improving worker comfort. By precise and comprehensive evaluations of ownership and operational expenses, farmers can acquire valuable information. This knowledge empowers them to make well-informed decisions about purchasing new machinery, optimizing existing equipment, or even exploring alternative methods to enhance their farm's productivity and financial outcomes. Therefore, a battery-operated leafy vegetable harvester is compared with manual harvesting in terms of cost economics. The present results reveal that the ownership and operating costs of the developed harvester are 76.86 Rs/h and 83.702 Rs/h. Compared to traditional methods, it saves an impressive 85.71% of the time and reduces costs by 54.12% during harvesting. The study determined that using battery-operated leafy vegetable harvesters is not only more cost-effective than manual harvesting but also environmentally friendly when compared to fuel-operated harvesting methods.
References (10)
- 1 Prospects for Chinese electric vehicle technologies in 2016–2020: Ambition and rationality [DOI]
- 2 The advent of modern solar-powered electric agricultural machinery: A solution for sustainable farm operations [DOI]
- 3 Can harvest outsourcing services reduce field harvest losses of rice in China? [DOI]
- 4 The impact of agricultural machinery service on technical efficiency of wheat production.
- 5 Performance Evaluation of Mechanical and Manual Harvesting of Sugarcane [DOI]
- 6 Development of a Cutter-Shredder-Baler to Harvest Long-Stem Willow [DOI]
- 7 APPLICATION OF CANE AND FORAGE HARVESTERS FOR BIOMASS FUEL RECOVERY [DOI]
- 8 Once-Over Mechanical Harvesting of Several Leafy Greens for Processing [DOI]
- 9 Research and Analysis on the Hydraulic Driving System of the Whole-stalk Sugarcane Harvester [DOI]
- 10 PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF ANTI-VIBRATION MEASURES FOR REDUCING HAND TRANSMITTED VIBRATION IN SELF PROPELLED VERTICAL CONVEYOR REAPER
Cited by 2
Chinmayee Parida, Pramoda Kumar Sahoo, Silpa Mandal · Ecology, environment & conservation · 2024
Showing 1 of 2 known citations — external sources report more than can currently be individually listed.
Related research
- Performance Evaluation of DBSKKV Developed Fruit harvesters for Matured Nutmeg Harvesting — shares topic coverage
- Comparison of Use of Mechanical Transplanters and Manual Transplanting for Paddy Cultivation in Thiruvananthapuram District — shares topic coverage
- Economic Evaluation of Precise Intelligent Cauliflower Harvester: A Comparative Study with Manual Harvesting — shares topic coverage
- Process Optimization, Quality Attributes, and Cost Economics of Jaggery-Incorporated Pedha (Traditional Indian Sweet) — shares topic coverage
- Efficiency and Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Developed Embedded System-Controlled Seed and Fertilizer Applicator — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
54
Page views
0
PDF downloads
10
Outbound clicks
2
Citations
Views over time
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.