Conversation Textbook Assessment: A Critique of Survival English
Journal of Education, Society and Behavioural Science · pp. 1613–1620 · Published 27 Jul 2014
10.9734/BJESBS/2014/11920Abstract
The development of the oral proficiency of EFL learners is facilitated when conversation textbooks contain two key features: contextualization and realism. The seven critical guidelines for the selection of such textbooks are the students' backgrounds, meaningful activities, cultural aspects, focusing on language forms, extended practice, and, finally, a synthesis of the preceding factors. With these features and guidelines as theoretical underpinnings, this paper presents a critique of the conversation textbook Survival English, the goal of which is to improve EFL students’ interaction skills so that they may thrive in the English-speaking world. While Survival English enjoys a reputation as a good textbook, it certainly could be a better textbook if the authors were to take several improvements into consideration. This paper provides constructive suggestions for textbook writers that could contribute positively to the instruction of English as a foreign language.
Cited by 0
No indexed citations yet.
Related research
- A Survey of Gender Representation in Social Studies Textbooks of Ethiopian Primary Schools — shares topic coverage
- Evaluation of Grade Nine Geography Textbook Vis-à-vis the Key Criteria of Problem Solving Skill Development — shares topic coverage
- The Effect of Implementing an Ethno-chemistry Book Integrated with AR on Students' Learning Motivation — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
7
Page views
0
PDF downloads
0
Outbound clicks
0
Citations
Views over time
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.