Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

Comparison of Different Methods in Estimating Reference Evapotranspiration at Gaya District of Bihar, India

I. Singh, A. K. Mishra, S. Suryavanshi

International Journal of Environment and Climate Change · pp. 1149–1157 · Published 29 Dec 2022

10.9734/ijecc/2022/v12i121553

Abstract

Evapotranspiration (ET), a complex mechanism in the hydrological cycle, influences runoff, which in turn influences how much water is required for irrigation. There are many techniques available to calculate of the reference evapotranspiration (ETo). Unfortunately, most efficient reference evapotranspiration approaches are parameter-rich models, making them unsuitable for use in data-scarce locations. On the other hand, accuracy and reliability of simple ETo models vary widely according to regional climate conditions. The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of two temperature-based and three radiation-based simple ET methods in estimating ET algorithms used to forecast the wheat crop for the years 2017–2018 in Gaya District, Bihar. The performance was measured by comparing the temperature and radiation-based method with the parameter intensive Penman-Monteith method. Comparative evaluation of two method (radiation and temperature) was performed through statistical tests, and it was found that the (R2 = 1 and R2 = 0.98) and RMSE = 0.84. The study found that ETo values calculated from the six methods were highly correlated (Pearson correlation coefficient 0.84 to 0.99). Through data analysis for model comparison, it was found that the Radiation method performed satisfactorily when compared to the standard Penman-Monteith model estimate (R2 = 0.94). However, multivariate statistical testing revealed that the ETo readings obtained using various techniques differed significantly from one another. In comparison to radiation-based ETo approaches, temperature-based ETo techniques showed greater disparities. The Priestley-Taylor, Turc, and Jensen-Haise methods all outperformed the other ETo methods in general. When estimating ETo in this study region, it was discovered that radiation-based approaches performed better than temperature-based methods.

Priestley-Taylor Jensen-Haise Hargreaves Turc Hargreaves-Samani Penman-Monteith

References (18)

  1. 1 Crop evapotranspiration : guidelines for computing crop water requirements
  2. 2 On the Assessment of Surface Heat Flux and Evaporation Using Large-Scale Parameters [DOI]
  3. 3 Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations [DOI]
  4. 4 Reference Crop Evapotranspiration from Temperature [DOI]
  5. 5 Estimating Potential Evapotranspiration [DOI]
  6. 6 Energy and Large-Scale Patterns of Animal- and Plant-Species Richness [DOI]
  7. 7 History and Evaluation of Hargreaves Evapotranspiration Equation [DOI]
  8. 8 Estimating Evapotranspiration from Solar Radiation [DOI]
  9. 9 A recommendation on standardized surface resistance for hourly calculation of reference ETo by the FAO56 Penman-Monteith method [DOI]
  10. 10 Journal of irrigation and drainage engineering
  11. 11 Evaluation of FAO Penman–Monteith and alternative methods for estimating reference evapotranspiration with missing data in Southern Ontario, Canada [DOI]
  12. 12 The NWS River Forecast System - catchment modeling.
  13. 13 Assessing reference evapotranspiration by the Hargreaves method in north-eastern Italy [DOI]
  14. 14 Prediction Accuracy for Projectwide Evapotranspiration Using Crop Coefficients and Reference Evapotranspiration [DOI]
  15. 15 Pan Evaporation to Reference Evapotranspiration Conversion Methods [DOI]
  16. 16 Estimating Reference Evapotranspiration with Minimum Data in Florida [DOI]
  17. 17 Comparison of different methods in estimating potential evapotranspiration at Muda Irrigation Scheme of Malaysia
  18. 18 Estimation of crop evapotranspiration through spatial distributed crop coefficient in a semi-arid environment [DOI]

Cited by 4

A novel integrated multicriteria decision analysis framework for group decision-making in evapotranspiration model selection

Dauda Pius Awhari, Mohamad Hidayat Bin Jamal, Mohd Khairul Idlan Bin Muhammad · Environment, Development and Sustainability · 2025

Showing 2 of 4 known citations — external sources report more than can currently be individually listed.

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

11

Page views

0

PDF downloads

1

Outbound clicks

4

Citations

Views over time

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.