Clinical Reasoning and Self-confidence Assessment Tool (CRESCAT): A Preliminary Validation Study
Abrão José Melhem Junior, Felipe Dunin dos Santos, Celso Nilo Didoné Filho, Gustavo Bianchini Porfirio, Danielle Soraya da Silva Figueiredo, Leandro Arthur Diehl, Pedro Alejandro Gordan, David Livingstone Alves Figueiredo
Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research · pp. 205–214 · Published 10 Feb 2025
10.9734/jammr/2025/v37i25734Abstract
Background: Case-based learning, a clinical reasoning inductive methodology, can be a pedagogical strategy for preclinical medical students. Self-confidence is also an essential issue in this phase of the medical course. Specific tools, such as questionnaires specially designed for this purpose, can better assess the development of these skills. Objective: To validate a questionnaire that assesses preclinical medical students' clinical reasoning accuracy and self-confidence. Methods: We designed the Clinical Reasoning and Self-confidence Assessment Tool (CRESCAT), which was developed and validated to measure accuracy and self-confidence. The target population is the first- and second-year medical students. The questionnaire is compounded by 7 clinical cases of commonly known diseases, with 5 to 6 questions for each case. An expert panel developed the answers’ template. A Likert scale was used to measure self-confidence. CRESCAT was applied in November 2022 to a more advanced sample than the preclinical students: Fourth-year students (4YMS, n=7) and internal medicine medical residents (IMMR, n=7). Statistical analysis included Cronbach’s alpha to determine the reliability of Likert scale answers. The Kruskal-Wallis test compared CRESCAT measures. Spearman’s correlation was applied for the primary objectives. Statistical significance was set at P < .050. Results: We observed an increase in average accuracy from 4YMS to IMMR (65.2±2.9% and 77.7±2.3%, respectively; P= .006). Although there was no difference in self-confidence averages, a moderate correlation was found between self-confidence and accuracy (Rs = .663, P = .001). The validation population considered the CRESCAT friendly and easy to answer. Conclusions: We tested a clinical reasoning and self-confidence assessment tool (CRESCAT) developed for preclinical medical students. It was applied to fourth-year students and medical residents, showing its potential to discriminate accuracy and correlate with self-confidence.
Cited by 0
No indexed citations yet.
Related research
- Effects of Formalin Inhalation on Physical Characteristics and Renal Profile of Albino Wistar Rats — shares topic coverage
- Association of Depression, Anxiety and Stress in Medical Students Studying in Modular, Semester and Annual Examination System — shares topic coverage
- Awareness of Knowledge, Attitude and Practices of Medical Students and Surgical Trainees Regarding Surgical Informed Consent: A Cross-sectional Multi-centric Study from Northern India — shares topic coverage
- Socioeconomic and Geographic Disparities in HIV/AIDS Knowledge Among Health Science Students in Guyana, College of Medical Sciences — shares topic coverage
- Case-Based Education: Stress during Learning in Morning Report Sessions — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
0
Page views
0
PDF downloads
0
Outbound clicks
0
Citations
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
No views recorded yet.
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
No traffic recorded yet.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.