Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

Assessment of Microbial, Physicochemical and Shelf-life of Sugarcane Jaggery Stored in Various Types of Packaging Materials

Huma Rana, Amar Prakash Garg, Sourabh Jain

European Journal of Nutrition & Food Safety · pp. 52–60 · Published 19 Feb 2024

10.9734/ejnfs/2024/v16i21387

Abstract

The main problems associated with Jaggery storage are liquefaction and deterioration of properties. When compared to fresh Jaggery, the packaging using various packing materials showed that there was a marked increase in moisture (15–22%) in the Jaggery packed in HDPE, but no discernible change in the percentage of moisture in the Jaggery stored in an aluminium pouch and LDPE environment. After six months of storage, Jaggery kept in glass jars and HDPE began to degrade, but Jaggery packed in aluminium pouches maintained levels of sucrose, moisture, reducing sugars, titratable acidity, pore space, and total microbial count comparable to fresh Jaggery at room temperature, and it continued to be significantly improved overall. The hardness of the Jaggery, which led to its lower acceptability, proved to be its main drawback. However, the physico-chemical characteristics and shelf life of the Jaggery under aluminium pouch and LDPE were comparable with fresh Jaggery samples. Objectives: The Jaggery industry is one of the largest and oldest in India, and the region in the north is known as the "sugar belt." However, small farmers face significant challenges in storing their Jaggery, which forces them to sell their product at a reduced price during the sugarcane season because it spoils quickly during rainy seasons. The goal of the current study was to evaluate the microbial, physicochemical, and shelf life of sugarcane Jaggery stored in various types of packaging material at room temperature. This was done to determine the impact of different packing materials with preserved properties comparable to fresh Jaggery, as the traditional method of storing Jaggery in villages reduces the product's market value and acceptability by causing microbial spoilage and bad odour. Methodology: In April 2022, Jaggery samples were made using sugarcane juice from four certified genotypes (Co 0237, Co 0238, CoS 767, and CoJ 64). The samples were then packaged in glass jars (GJ), aluminium pouches (AP), and low- and high-density polythene (LDPE) bags. After being stored for six months, the samples were examined for physicochemical, microbiological, and general acceptability characteristics. Using potato dextrose agar (PDA) and nutritional agar (NAM) medium, microbial counts for bacteria, mould, and yeasts were assessed. Results and Conclusions: The traditional way of storage was compared with future storage ways with improved preservation of properties with an eye on better trade practices. It was found that the Jaggery packed in aluminium pouch showed better preserved properties comparable to fresh for sale in the market.

Jaggery shelf life aluminium pouch packaging HDPE LDPE microbial evaluation

Cited by 5

Traditional production, grading, nutritional value, packaging and value addition of palmyra, date, and coconut palm jaggery

C. Agritha, Shubham Chandrakar, N. Venkatachalapathy · Journal of food science and technology · 2026

A Better and Cheaper Culture Medium for Isolation of Lactic Acid Bacteria from Milk and its Products

A. P. Garg, Anchal Bamal, Rashmi Goley · Biosciences Biotechnology Research Asia · 2025

Exploring the influence of active packaging systems on microwaved-processed jaggery: a real-time study on shelf life

Prabodh Halde, S. Deotale, Yogita Chavan · Journal of food science and technology · 2024

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

0

Page views

0

PDF downloads

0

Outbound clicks

5

Citations

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

No views recorded yet.

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

No traffic recorded yet.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.