Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

An Absolute Deviation Approach to Assessing Correlation

Stephen Gorard

Journal of Education, Society and Behavioural Science · pp. 73–81 · Published 24 Sep 2014

10.9734/BJESBS/2015/11381

Abstract

This paper describes two possible alternatives to the more traditional Pearson’s R correlation coefficient, both based on using the mean absolute deviation, rather than the standard deviation, as a measure of dispersion. Pearson’s R is well-established and has many advantages. However, these newer variants also have several advantages, including greater simplicity and ease of computation, and perhaps greater tolerance of underlying assumptions (such as the need for linearity). The first alternative approach simply divides the co-variance by the mean absolute deviation(s) instead of the standard deviation as in Pearson’s R. The second alternative uses the sum of each pair of deviations in x and y instead of the covariance, and again uses the mean absolute deviation(s) as the denominator. All three are compared to one another using 30,000 simulations based on 100 pairs of random numbers. The substantive findings are the same for each approach, and the ‘coefficients’ correlate with each other (using R) at +0.99 to 1.00. The three approaches also give the same substantive findings when trialled with real-life secondary datasets. This introduction of simpler kinds of correlation forms part of an attempt to simplify the use of numeric analysis, to make it more ‘everyday’, for the benefit of both analysts and consumers of evidence.

Mean absolute deviation correlation quantitative methods initiative statistical methods the new statistics

Cited by 12

Elementary and Robust Distribution Shape Analysis via Mean Absolute Deviations and Quantile-Based Quadrature Approximations

Triparna Kundu, Rashanjot Kaur, Eugene Pinsky · Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Analyses · 2026

A critical review on selecting performance evaluation metrics for supervised machine learning models in wastewater quality prediction

H. Khoshvaght, R. Permala, Amir Razmjou · Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering · 2025

Advanced Validated Mathematical Model for Multiple Inputs Single Output Photovoltaic System

N. A. Shashoa, H. Oudira, A. Chouder · 2025 Innovations in Intelligent Systems and Applications Conference (ASYU) · 2025

A Sensor for Counting Foraging Honeybees by Pulse Compression of Their Unique LFM Radar Signature

Herbert M. Aumann, Nuri W. Emanetoglu · Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems · 2025

MAD (about median) vs. quantile-based alternatives for classical standard deviation, skewness, and kurtosis

Eugene Pinsky, S. Klawansky · Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics · 2023

The 'Bad Behavior Index': A Composite Measure of the Development Hindering Behavior of Individuals and Institutions

Mohammad Tariq Al Fozaie · Scientific Annals of Economics and Business · 2023

A Simplified Correlation Index for Fast Real-Time Pulse Shape Recognition

A. Cicuttin, Iván René Morales, M. Crespo · Italian National Conference on Sensors · 2022

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

32

Page views

0

PDF downloads

2

Outbound clicks

12

Citations

Views over time

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.