Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

A Narrative Review on Nature-Positive Agriculture: Integrating Biodiversity Conservation with Climate-Resilient Farming

Radhey Shyam Singh, Samir Pratap Singh, Lalbabu Kumar

International Journal of Environment and Climate Change · pp. 927–940 · Published 12 Aug 2026

10.9734/ijecc/2026/v16i85672

Abstract

The accelerating deterioration of global biodiversity, driven in large part by the expansion and intensification of agricultural production, now constitutes one of the most urgent challenges facing humanity. Simultaneously, agriculture itself is increasingly vulnerable to the ecosystem service losses that biodiversity decline engenders. Nature-positive agriculture—a framework that seeks to halt and reverse biodiversity loss while sustaining productive, resilient, and economically viable food systems—has emerged as a compelling paradigm for reconciling food security with environmental stewardship. This narrative review synthesises peer-reviewed evidence on the ecological, agronomic, and policy dimensions of nature-positive agriculture, drawing on literature published between 2001 and 2026 and sourced from Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar, PubMed, and several field-specific databases. The review examines the bidirectional relationship between agricultural practice and biodiversity, explores the empirical basis for practice-based interventions including agroforestry, cover cropping, crop diversification, organic farming, and integrated pest management, and evaluates landscape-scale and policy mechanisms for enabling systemic transition. Evidence consistently demonstrates that biodiversity-enhancing farming practices generate measurable co-benefits for soil health, carbon sequestration, crop pollination, and natural pest regulation—all of which underpin climate resilience. However, realising these benefits at scale demands coordinated action across farm, landscape, and governance levels, supported by reformed subsidy structures and international biodiversity frameworks. The article concludes by identifying critical research gaps, including the need for place-based integration of indigenous knowledge, more robust socioeconomic assessments of nature-positive transitions, and stronger monitoring indicators aligned with the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework.

Biodiversity conservation agroecology climate resilience ecosystem services agroforestry integrated pest management

Cited by 0

No indexed citations yet.

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

60

Page views

0

PDF downloads

16

Outbound clicks

0

Citations

Views over time

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.