A Narrative Review on Nature-Positive Agriculture: Integrating Biodiversity Conservation with Climate-Resilient Farming
Radhey Shyam Singh, Samir Pratap Singh, Lalbabu Kumar
International Journal of Environment and Climate Change · pp. 927–940 · Published 12 Aug 2026
10.9734/ijecc/2026/v16i85672Abstract
The accelerating deterioration of global biodiversity, driven in large part by the expansion and intensification of agricultural production, now constitutes one of the most urgent challenges facing humanity. Simultaneously, agriculture itself is increasingly vulnerable to the ecosystem service losses that biodiversity decline engenders. Nature-positive agriculture—a framework that seeks to halt and reverse biodiversity loss while sustaining productive, resilient, and economically viable food systems—has emerged as a compelling paradigm for reconciling food security with environmental stewardship. This narrative review synthesises peer-reviewed evidence on the ecological, agronomic, and policy dimensions of nature-positive agriculture, drawing on literature published between 2001 and 2026 and sourced from Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar, PubMed, and several field-specific databases. The review examines the bidirectional relationship between agricultural practice and biodiversity, explores the empirical basis for practice-based interventions including agroforestry, cover cropping, crop diversification, organic farming, and integrated pest management, and evaluates landscape-scale and policy mechanisms for enabling systemic transition. Evidence consistently demonstrates that biodiversity-enhancing farming practices generate measurable co-benefits for soil health, carbon sequestration, crop pollination, and natural pest regulation—all of which underpin climate resilience. However, realising these benefits at scale demands coordinated action across farm, landscape, and governance levels, supported by reformed subsidy structures and international biodiversity frameworks. The article concludes by identifying critical research gaps, including the need for place-based integration of indigenous knowledge, more robust socioeconomic assessments of nature-positive transitions, and stronger monitoring indicators aligned with the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework.
Cited by 0
No indexed citations yet.
Related research
- Bio-management Options for Ecosystem Services, Carbon Sequestration and Climate Change Adaptation in Saline Environment — shares topic coverage
- Ecosystem Services of the Argan Forest, the Current State and Trends — shares topic coverage
- Ecosystem Regulatory Services and Human Comfort in an Outdoor Environment of Lokoja, Nigeria — shares topic coverage
- Threats and Opportunities of Ecosystem Services: A Geographical Study of Purbasthali Oxbow Lake — shares topic coverage
- Agroforestry Systems for Enhancing Biodiversity and Soil Conservation in Agricultural Landscapes — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
60
Page views
0
PDF downloads
16
Outbound clicks
0
Citations
Views over time
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.