Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

Quasi-Experts’ Assessments of Creative Products: An Evaluation Using a Sample of Design Students

Kuan Chen Tsai

Journal of Education, Society and Behavioural Science · pp. 1–7 · Published 8 Oct 2015

10.9734/BJESBS/2016/21057

Abstract

The current study was designed to examine the possible use of quasi-experts (design-college students) to assess creative products (four-frame comic strips). The research questions we sought to answer were: (a) Can the consensual assessment technique (CAT) yield reliable ratings when quasi-experts are used as judges? And (b) can quasi-expert provides reliable ratings of comic strips across raters and across multiple comic strips? The results of our experiment using quasi-expert judges of visual creativity show significant positive correlations among the 10 rated comic strips across our five criteria of creativity. Another important finding is that the CAT is suitable for use with design students in a Chinese context. The current study indicated that art educators should encourage their art students to play the role of art critics, discussing the strengths and weaknesses of each other’s work more frequently.

Creativity quasi-experts art and design education Chinese students CAT

Cited by 4

An empirical examination of the relationships among creativity, the evaluation of creative products, and cognitive style among Chinese undergraduates

Kuan-Chen Tsai · International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science Engineering and Education · 2018

Design Students’ Theories of Creativity: A Macau Perspective

Kuan Chen Tsai · Journal of Asian Development · 2016

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

0

Page views

0

PDF downloads

0

Outbound clicks

4

Citations

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

No views recorded yet.

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

No traffic recorded yet.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.