Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

Impact of Bacillus subtilis on Tomato Plants Growth and Some Biochemical Characteristics under Combined Application with Humic Fertilizer

V. N. Pishchik, N. I. Vorobyev, Yu. V. Ostankova, A. V. Semenov, A. Totolian Areg, A. A. Popov, Y. V. Khomyakov, O. R. Udalova, D. V. Shibanov, V. E. Vertebny, V. I. Dubovitskaya, O. V. Sviridova, O. S. Walsh, S. Shafian

International Journal of Plant & Soil Science · pp. 1–12 · Published 12 May 2018

10.9734/IJPSS/2018/41148

Abstract

In this study we investigated the mechanisms of action and effect of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) Bacillus subtilis No.2 when utilized alone and in conjunction with a humic fertilizer (HF). Different mechanisms of action of B. subtilis No.2 and HF Stimulife on tomato plants were identified in pot experiments under controlled conditions. PGPR B. subtilis No.2 was identified by using the16s rRNA gene sequence method. We applied factor analyses to evaluate differences in the responses of plants to the individual effects of B. subtilis No.2 and HF when they were used together. Auxin-producing B. subtilis No.2 enhanced tomato yield by increased average number of fruits per plant. Humic fertilizer Stimulife, which also contains auxins, improved tomato yield by increasing average fruit weight. As shown by factor analysis, the impact of weight coefficients for plant responses (across tomato varieties) to B. subtilis No.2 and Stimulife were 0.54 and 0.28, respectively, indicating a greater response to B. subtilis No.2 than to HF Stimulife. Combined use of Stimulife and B. subtilis No.2 had a positive impact on tomato yield, increasing fruit yield by 25-29%. Tomato fruit quality was improved by increasing the amounts of dry matter, carbohydrates, sugar-index acid, and ascorbic acid. Results suggest that HF Stimulife and B. subtilis No.2could be successfully used to enhance tomato plant growth and yield under controlled conditions. We hypothesize that, along with direct impact, HF may also indirectly affect plants by stimulating PGPR.

PGPR Bacillus subtilis No.2 humic fertilizer tomato physiological and biochemical characteristics

Cited by 16

Mode of Action in Bacteria Bacillus subtilis no. 2 and Humic Preparation on Fruit Formation in Sweet Pepper

V. Pishchik, N. I. Vorobyov, O. R. Udalova · Russian Agricultural Sciences · 2019

Promotion of saladette tomato growth with Bacillus cereus and solarized manure in greenhouse

Alfonso Andrade-Sifuentes, M. Fortis-Hernández, P. Preciado-Rangel · 2022

Soil Microbes and Plant Health

Farheen Nazli, Najm-ul-Seher, M. Khan · 2020

A case study of a profitable mid-tech greenhouse for the sustainable production of tomato, using a biofertilizer and a biofungicide

Leobardo Serrano-Carreón, Sergio Aranda-Ocampo, Karina A. Balderas-Ruíz · Electronic Journal of Biotechnology · 2022

EFFECT OF BIOLOGICALLY ACTIVE PREPARATIONS ON PRODUCTIVITY AND QUALITY OF SWEET PEPPER FRUITS IN CONTROLLED CONDITIONS

O. R. Udalova, V. N. Pishchik, G. V. Mirskaya · Vegetable crops of Russia · 2018

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

0

Page views

0

PDF downloads

0

Outbound clicks

16

Citations

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

No views recorded yet.

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

No traffic recorded yet.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.