Sensitivity of the Blue Dye Food Test for Detecting Aspiration in Patients with a Tracheotomy
Susan Brady, Richard Krieger, Michele Wesling, Scott Kaszuba, Joseph Donzelli, Michael Pietrantoni
Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology · pp. 429–435 · Published 24 Feb 2015
10.9734/BJAST/2015/11652Abstract
Aims: To explore the sensitivity and specificity values for aspiration with the blue dye food test (BDFT) in tracheotomized patients undergoing inpatient rehabilitation and explore what impact, if any, the accumulated oropharyngeal secretion level has upon the accuracy of the BDFT. Methodology: Simultaneous BDFT and fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) procedure were conducted with 21 tracheotomized patients. The patient’s accumulated oropharyngeal secretion level was evaluated first using a 5-point secretion severity scale. The patients then received ice chips and various boluses which were dyed blue. The BDFT was considered positive for aspiration when blue tinged material was present upon tracheal suctioning, around the stoma site, or on the tracheotomy tube upon its removal. The FEES was considered positive for aspiration when the bolus passed through the vocal folds as observed by nasal endoscopy. In cases where no blue material was observed on the BDFT, the additional step of subglottal viewing through the tracheostoma was performed. Results: Results revealed the sensitivity of the BDFTfor the detection of aspiration was only 0.4 when compared to the FEES during simultaneous examinations. Statistically significant differences were observed between secretion severity level and a positive BDFT as Group 1 (true positive BDFT) mean secretion level was 4.5, Group 2 (false negative BDFT) was 2.33, and Group 3 (true negative BDFT) was 2.0 (F=8.143, p=0.003). Conclusion: Results further support that the BDFT demonstrates poor sensitivity for aspiration detection in patients with a tracheotomy. Results reveal for the first time the potential influence accumulated oropharyngeal secretions may have upon the likelihood of a positive BDFT. Results do not support use of the BDFT in isolation for definitive detection of aspiration. Potential uses for the BDFT in a clinical setting are discussed.
Cited by 4
Jessica M. Pisegna · Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups · 2022
Manuel Muñoz-Garach, Olga Moreno-Romero, Rosario Ramirez-Puerta · Diagnostics · 2023
Sibylle Béchet, Fiona Hill, Órla Gilheaney · Dysphagia · 2016
Matías Otto‐Yáñez, Gonzalo Monge, Tamara Muñoz · Nursing & Health Sciences · 2025
Related research
- Clinical, Endoscopic and Histopathological Patterns among Patients with Dyspepsia — shares topic coverage
- A Review and Comparison on the Effectiveness and Safety Profile of Using Ketamine and Propofol for Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Literature Review — shares topic coverage
- Extraluminal Migration of a Foreign Body from Upper Digestive Tract: A Case Report — shares topic coverage
- The Current Management of Achalasia Cardia: A Narrative Review Article — shares topic coverage
- Hookworm Infection in Infant: A Case Study and Review of Literature — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
0
Page views
0
PDF downloads
0
Outbound clicks
4
Citations
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
No views recorded yet.
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
No traffic recorded yet.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.