Understanding the Learning Style Preferences of ODL Students Using VARK Model: Implications for Individualized Pedagogy and Student Success
Binayak Dey, Bhujendra Nath Panda
Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies · pp. 323–331 · Published 8 Apr 2024
10.9734/ajess/2024/v50i51365Abstract
Aims: The study aims to assess the learning styles among ODL students in higher education, and propose practical strategies for integrating personalized learning approaches to enhance student engagement and educational outcomes. Place and Duration of Study: Research was carried out among the higher education students who enrolled in different ODL programs under the dual-mode universities. Survey was administered during Personal Contact Programme (PCP) for the academic session of 2023-2024. Methodology: Descriptive survey design was employed to gather quantitative data on higher education students learning styles under ODL mode of study and provides a deeper understanding of ODL students' learning preferences based on VARK model. The sample comprised of 246 post-graduate ODL students from various disciplines. A simple random sampling technique was employed to ensure representation from diverse academic backgrounds of ODL students. Results: Study revealed significant variations in learning style preferences among the ODL students. There are 89 (36.18%) ODL students with single preference of learning style and 157 (63.82%) ODL students with multimodal preference of learning style. Statistically significant difference found between male and female ODL students concerning their learning styles. Visual learning style is the most preferred learning style, followed by aural, kinesthetic, and read/write learning style respectively. Majority of ODL students preferred to learn by multiple sensory modalities. Conclusion: Integrating learning style assessments into distance learning practices holds immense promise for enhancing the effectiveness and efficiency of distance education. Designing course curriculum for distance education based on multiple sensory modalities is crucial for enhancing learning outcomes and student engagement. Incorporating various sensory channels such as visual, auditory, kinesthetic, and read/write, ODL professionals can cater to diverse learning styles and preferences, ultimately promoting a deeper understanding of the subject matter and academic success.
Cited by 9
Nathaniel Autida · Journal of Educational Issues · 2024
Siva Raja Sindiramutty, Bashir Riskhan, Mamoona Humayun · Gamification Learning Framework for Cybersecurity Education · 2025
N. Jayapriya, Kumari Kabita · i-manager's Journal on School Educational Technology · 2025
Aydın Yeşilyurt, Mustafa Caner · Interactive Learning Environments · 2025
Showing 4 of 9 known citations — external sources report more than can currently be individually listed.
Related research
- Does Learning Style Make a Difference on Student’s Academic Performance? Learning Style Preferences of Medical Students from University Tunku Abdul Rahman — shares topic coverage
- Learning Style Preferences of Medical Students in Perdana University-Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland School of Medicine, Malaysia — shares topic coverage
- A Study on the Influence of the Matching between Learning Style and Teaching Style on the Academic Record of English Majors — shares topic coverage
- Mathematical Skills and the Academic Performance of Junior and Senior Electrical Engineering Students of the University of Eastern Philippines — shares topic coverage
- Learning Styles and Keyword Association Variations on Vocabulary Retention — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
0
Page views
0
PDF downloads
0
Outbound clicks
9
Citations
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
No views recorded yet.
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
No traffic recorded yet.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.