Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 3.0

Treatment of Wastewaters Generated by Surfactant-Enhanced Washing of Soils in an Aerobic Biofilter Inoculated with a Consortium of Hydrocarbon Degraders

M. Zacarías-Salinas, E. I. Garcia-Peña, L. G. Torres

Biotechnology Journal International · pp. 471–484 · Published 13 Jul 2013

10.9734/BBJ/2013/4010

Abstract

Aims: The aims of this work were 1) To evaluate the performance of a submerged biofiltration system for the treatment of a surfactant-enriched wastewater that had been generated by a soil washing process. 2) To evaluate the effect of the flux and organic load over the performance of the system. 3) To determine the microbial evolution as an effect of the flux at different lengths of the biofilter by using a denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) analysis. Study Design: A three factorial design was used to evaluate the effect of different fluxes and organic loads over the performance of a continuously operated submerged aerobic biofilter. The DGGE technique was employed to determine microbial changes in the biofilter. Place and Duration of Study: The study was carried out at the Bioprocess Laboratory, Bioprocesses Department UPIBI-IPN, Mexico. The experimental stage lasted approximately eight months and the DGGE analysis four months more. Methodology: Contaminated soil was physicochemical and microbiologically characterized. A total of 70 kg of contaminated soil was washed using a 1:3 ratio soil/surfactant solution (0.5% Sulfopon 30-SP30). The surfactant-enriched wastewater was then treated in a submerged biofilter. The biofiltration system consisted of a column with a length of 50 cm and diameter of 12 cm. The biofilter was packed with tezontle with an average diameter of 0.2-0.4 cm and 70% void space. The biofilter working volume was 4.5 L. The samples of the packing material for the DGGE analysis were obtained from the ports located along the biofilter: at the wastewater inlet, at the middle of the column and at the outlet. After DNA extraction with a Power Soil DNA Isolation Kit (MO BIO), PCR (polymerase chain reaction) analysis was conducted. The 16S rRNA gene was amplified using universal bacterial primers. The data obtained by DGGE analysis for the microbial population developed in the biofilter were further analyzed by the Jaccard similarity coefficient. Results: The soil contained 14,704 mg/kg TPH. BTEX compounds were not found, and only two different PAHs were found in the soil samples: benzo-fluoranthene and benzopyrene, at concentrations of 0.1280 and 0.0682 mg/kg of soil, respectively. During the surfactant-aided soil washing, the highest removal percentage of the oil removed from the soil was 59% with 0.5% SP30. The wastewater generated after the soil washing process contained, in average 1,329 mg COD/L and 211 mg/L of grease and oil. Higher COD removals were obtained at a flux of 0.4 L/h for both of the COD initial concentrations. While the highest removal was 78.27%, determined at an initial COD concentration of 300 mg/L. When applying fluxes of 0.28 and 0.40 L/h at a higher initial COD concentration, the COD removals were increased; this was not the case for a flux of 0.63 L/h. For a given initial COD concentration, the removal efficiencies were higher for lower fluxes. Analysis of the similarity between the microbial populations for varying fluxes and levels along the length of the biofilter was determined by the Jaccard (JI) index. The results showed that the initial microbial populations (t0) have low similarities with the developed microbial populations at the different conditions tested. Conclusion: Both the flux and the initial COD concentration had an impact on COD removal and the microbial concentration in the column. The COD removal percentages were similar at fluxes of 0.28 and 0.63 L/h. The highest removal percentage of 78.27% was obtained at a flux of 0.4L/h; this finding was in agreement with the highest microbial count and the specialization of microbial populations (less diversity). In general, it was shown that the flux had an effect on changes in microbial population. Greater effects were observed on the microbial population due to the position along the reactor, e.g., the greatest differences were found at the different levels of the biofilter.

Biofilter DGGE heavy oil fraction surfactants

References (28)

  1. 1 Improved extraction of PCR-quality community DNA from digesta and fecal samples [DOI]
  2. 2 Biofilm characterization and activity analysis in water and wastewater treatment [DOI]
  3. 3 Evaluation of biosurfactants for crude oil contaminated soil washing [DOI]
  4. 4 Efficiency of surfactant-enhanced desorption for contaminated soils depending on the component characteristics of soil-surfactant–PAHs system [DOI]
  5. 5 Kinetic Aspects of Surfactant Solubilization of Soil-Bound Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons [DOI]
  6. 6 The effect of inorganic and organic supplements on the microbial degradation of phenanthrene and pyrene in soils [DOI]
  7. 7 Microbial communities and their interactions in biofilm systems: an overview [DOI]
  8. 8 Impact of Temperature on Drinking Water Biofilter Performance and Microbial Community Structure [DOI]
  9. 9 Washing of field weathered crude oil contaminated soil with an environmentally compatible surfactant, alkyl polyglucoside [DOI]
  10. 10 Microbial community and physicochemical analysis of an industrial waste gas biofilter and design of 16S rRNA‐targeting oligonucleotide probes [DOI]
  11. 11 Degradation of sodium dodecyl sulphate in water using solar driven Fenton-like advanced oxidation processes [DOI]
  12. 12 Decontamination of soil washing wastewater using solar driven advanced oxidation processes [DOI]
  13. 13 Isolate PM1 populations are dominant and novel methyl tert‐ butyl ether‐degrading bacteria in compost biofilter enrichments [DOI]
  14. 14 The application of a mulch biofilm barrier for surfactant enhanced polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon bioremediation [DOI]
  15. 15 Nonionic surfactants adsorption onto activated carbon. Influence of the polar chain length [DOI]
  16. 16 Enumeration of phenanthrene-degrading bacteria by an overlayer technique and its use in evaluation of petroleum-contaminated sites [DOI]
  17. 17 Assessment of Changes in Microbial Community Structure during Operation of an Ammonia Biofilter with Molecular Tools [DOI]
  18. 18 Assessment of changes in the microorganism community in a biofilter [DOI]
  19. 19 Structure of microbial communities in ethanol biofilters [DOI]
  20. 20 TPH-contaminated Mexican Refinery Soil: Health Risk Assessment and the First Year of Changes [DOI]
  21. 21 Assessment of microbial populations in methyl ethyl ketone degrading biofilters by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis [DOI]
  22. 22 Elimination of aromatic surfactants from municipal wastewaters: comparison of conventional activated sludge treatment and membrane biological reactor [DOI]
  23. 23 Treatment of Fuel-Oil Contaminated Soils by Biodegradable Surfactant Washing Followed by Fenton-Like Oxidation [DOI]
  24. 24 Comparison of bioreactors with different kinds of submerged packed beds for domestic wastewater treatment [DOI]
  25. 25 Surfactant-Enhanced Washing of Soils Contaminated with Wasted-Automotive Oils and the Quality of the Produced Wastewater [DOI]
  26. 26 Surfactant Enhanced Washing of Drilling Fluids, a Promising Remediation Technique [DOI]
  27. 27 Effect of Triton X-100 on the Rate of Trichloroethene Desorption from Soil to Water [DOI]
  28. 28 Biodegradation of Two Nonionic Surfactants Used for In Situ Flushing of Oil-Contaminated Soils [DOI]

Cited by 0

No indexed citations yet.

Related research

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

55

Page views

0

PDF downloads

24

Outbound clicks

0

Citations

Views over time

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.