Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

Bacteriological Load in Traditional Food Packaging Paper

Md. Sohel Rana, Shohel Mahmud, Md. Arif Hossain, Masud Rana, Enamul Kabir, Ashish Kumar Das, Rajib Kanti Roy

Journal of Advances in Microbiology · pp. 1–9 · Published 16 Mar 2019

10.9734/jamb/2019/v15i230085

Abstract

Aims: To determine bacteriological load of rejected papers used as food packaging materials and assess their prevalence of use by food vendors. Methods and Results: Food vendors (n=116) were selected purposively from various street food, fast food, small and large dining stalls or hotels located at Jashore, Bangladesh. Paper samples randomly collected from these vendors were later categorized into 5 different types as food wrapping, plate covering, tray spreading paper and hand cleaning. Then, 7 paper samples from these each 5 types were randomly sampled for microbial analysis. Swabbing and defibering methods for bacterial analysis and SPSS for statistical analysis were employed. The number of bacteria by the defibering method was in the range of (1.9×108-7.5×108) Cfu/g. Sample papers tested by swabbing method contained between minimum 1.2×108 and maximum 9.2×108Cfu/cm2. Under swabbing method, the minimum average bacterial count was 2.8×108 Cfu/cm2 in food serving paper samples and maximum 4.7×108 Cfu/cm2 in wrapping paper samples. By defibering method, maximum average of bacterial load was found in tray spreading paper samples as 5.3×108Cfu/g and minimum average was in plate covering paper as 4.4x108Cfu/g. Types of paper samples were not significantly different when compared with each other against their mean bacterial concentration found by swabbing method (F=0.961, p=0.443) as well as defibering method (F=2.227, p=0.09).The mean quantity of paper use per vendor surveyed was as much as 1.26 kg a day. Anticipatedly, quantity extent of paper use (kg/day) based on the types of food shops showed a significant difference (F=3.9, p=0.01), as understandably, paper use among different shops was apparently highly variable. Conclusions: The paper samples used for food wrapping and packaging showed high bacterial contamination more than standard acceptance level. There is an urgent need to discourage the use of these papers as food packaging material by creating awareness among food vendors and consumers regarding its harmful effects.

Bacteriological load fast food food packaging newspaper in food bacterial contamination trash paper microorganisms in the paper.

Cited by 6

Recent Advances in Food Packaging Technology Using Nanotechnology

Mohamed Saied, Mohamed Bassyouni, Miroslawa El Fray · Packaging Technology and Science · 2025

Evaluation of food packaging paper for microbial load and storage effect on the microbial activity of paper

Saher Zaidi, Mudita Vats, Nitin Kumar · Packaging Technology and Science · 2022

Detection and profiling of antibiotic resistance among bacteria isolates from new and unused styrofoam and single use plastics sold in Orlu, Imo State Nigeria

Peter Anyigor Edeh, Uchechukwu Onyeukwu Ekuma, John Ugadu Ede · GSC Biological and Pharmaceutical Sciences · 2025

Physical and Mechanical Properties of Paper Packaging in the Food Industry

Mehmet Onurhan GÜCÜŞ · Bartın Orman Fakültesi Dergisi · 2023

Microbiological Study of Food Packaging Paper of Kathmandu Valley

Anupa Kumari Budhathoki, Deepa Pudasaini, Geeta Gurung · Tribhuvan University Journal of Microbiology · 2021

Starch/Carrageenan Blend-Based Biocomposites as Packaging Materials

Heru Suryanto, Uun Yanuhar, Aminnudin · Composites Science and Technology · 2023

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

0

Page views

0

PDF downloads

0

Outbound clicks

6

Citations

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

No views recorded yet.

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

No traffic recorded yet.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.