The Necessity of Randomized Clinical Trials
Janus Christian Jakobsen, Christian Gluud
Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research · pp. 1453–1468 · Published 1 May 2013
10.9734/BJMMR/2013/3208Abstract
Aims: The hierarchy of evidence-based medicine determines the inferential powers of different clinical research designs. We want to address the difficult question if observational evidence under some circumstances can validate intervention effects. Methodology: Assessment of previous argumentation aiming at a clear conclusion for future decision-making. Results: We present five arguments demonstrating the fundamental need of randomized clinical trials to sufficiently validate intervention effects. Furthermore, we argue that hindrances to the conduct of randomized clinical trials can be lessened through education, collaboration, infrastructure, and other measures. Our arguments validate why the randomized clinical trial should and must be the study design evaluating interventions. By choosing the randomized clinical trial as the primary study design, effective preventive, prognostic, diagnostic, and therapeutic interventions will reach more patients earlier. Conclusion: Clinical experience or observational studies should never be used as the sole basis for assessment of intervention effects — randomized clinical trials are always needed. Therefore, always randomize the first patient as Thomas C Chalmers suggested in 1977. Observational studies should primarily be used for quality control after treatments are included in clinical practice.
Cited by 50
Ole Jakob Storebø, Maja Rosenberg Overby Storm, Johanne Pereira Ribeiro · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2025
Goran Bjelakovic, Dimitrinka Nikolova, Christian Gluud · Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care · 2013
Anders Kehlet Nørskov, Theis Lange, Emil Eik Nielsen · BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine · 2020
Janus Christian Jakobsen, Jørn Wetterslev, Christian Gluud · BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine · 2019
Emil Eik Nielsen, Anders Kehlet Nørskov, Theis Lange · BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine · 2019
Ning Liang, De-Zhao Kong, Si-Si Ma · The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine · 2019
Silvio Garattini, Janus C. Jakobsen, Jørn Wetterslev · European Journal of Internal Medicine · 2016
Ole Jakob Storebø, Maria Skoog, Pernille Darling Rasmussen · Journal of Attention Disorders · 2014
Pernille Kähler, Berit Grevstad, Thomas Almdal · BMJ Open · 2014
Janus Christian Jakobsen, Christian Gluud, Mickey Kongerslev · BMJ Open · 2014
Showing 20 of 50 known citations — external sources report more than can currently be individually listed.
Related research
- Review of the Literature on Oral Cancer: Epidemiology, Management and Evidence-based Traditional Medicine Treatment — shares topic coverage
- Evaluation of Evidence Based Medicine Knowledge and Skills among a Sample of Medical Students in King Abdul Aziz University: A Follow up Study — shares topic coverage
- Evidence Based Medicine: Assessing Knowledge, Attitudes and Barriers in Post-graduate Training — shares topic coverage
- A Pilot Study of Web Based Clinical Supervision for Clinicians Working with Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorders and Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorders — shares topic coverage
- Physicians' Perspectives Toward Shared Decision Making in Developing Countries — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
58
Page views
0
PDF downloads
4
Outbound clicks
50
Citations
Views over time
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.