Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

The Kitulo National Park Transformation and the Implications on Sustainable Livelihoods to Adjacent Local Communities in Makete District, Tanzania

Mziray , Laurent Filbert, Kyando , Samson Bosco, Laurent Filbert Mziray, Samson Bosco Kyando, ’ong’o , Henry George Mung, Henry George Mung ’ong’o

International Journal of Environment and Climate Change · pp. 1539–1559 · Published 13 Jun 2023

10.9734/ijecc/2023/v13i82103

Abstract

Aims: The study investigates the process of change of the Kitulo plateau to Kitulo national park status and the implications on sustainable livelihoods to adjacent local communities in Makete District. Study Design: The study adopted a mixed research design which allows for the triangulation of qualitative and quantitative methods to gain a better understanding of the studied subject matter. Methodology: Simple random and purposive sampling was used to select respondents for the study. Household survey, in-depth interviews, observation and document review methods were used to collect data. The household survey included 114 heads of households. Qualitative data were subjected to content analysis and statistical analysis using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) used for quantitative data. Land use changes were captured and presented using Geographical Information System (GIS). Results: The establishment of the Kitulo National Park from Kitulo plateau was not participatory as 82.5% of local communities were not involved in the process and even during the gazettement of the Kitulo National Park. The main actors in the process of change were government leaders and NGOs (87.7%), TANAPA (8.7%) and local communities (3.6%). These results implies that majority of the people were not involved which may affect in supporting conservation activities. Also, the justifications for the establishment of the park were to improve conservation of water catchment sources and high value of biodiversity. Furthermore, livelihoods benefits were constructing development projects and enhancing livelihoods of neighbouring communities. Conclusion: The transformation of Kitulo plateau to the Kitulo national park was not bottom up participatory approach which made negative perception and attitude from local community towards the establishment of the park. Therefore, because the park has led to loss of major livelihoods activities to local communities, this paper thus seeks to recommend to increase more livelihood supports benefits and launching of sensitization programme for clear understanding on the purpose of the park and its benefits which will ensure the park sustainability.

Kitulo plateau Kitulo National Park livelihoods sustainability chikanda Bustani ya Mungu displacement

References (32)

  1. 1 Effectiveness of Parks in Protecting Tropical Biodiversity [DOI]
  2. 2 Parks and Peoples: The Social Impact of Protected Areas [DOI]
  3. 3 Measuring the extent and effectiveness of protected areas as an indicator for meeting global biodiversity targets [DOI]
  4. 4 Why local people do not support conservation: Community perceptions of marine protected area livelihood impacts, governance and management in Thailand [DOI]
  5. 5 Natural Connections: Perspectives in Community-Based Conservation [DOI]
  6. 6 The role of Indigenous peoples and local communities in effective and equitable conservation [DOI]
  7. 7 People, Parks and Poverty: Political Ecology and Biodiversity Conservation
  8. 8 World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA)
  9. 9 Annual review of environment and resources
  10. 10 Eviction for Conservation: A Global Overview
  11. 11 Poverty Risks and National Parks: Policy Issues in Conservation and Resettlement [DOI]
  12. 12 Who should pay for tropical conservation, and how could the costs be met? [DOI]
  13. 13 Upgrading protected areas to conserve wild biodiversity [DOI]
  14. 14 Mapping Change in Human Pressure Globally on Land and within Protected Areas [DOI]
  15. 15 Community Conservation, Inequality and Injustice. Myths of Power in Protected Area Management
  16. 16 Human well-being impacts of terrestrial protected areas [DOI]
  17. 17 Governance principles for community‐centered conservation in the post‐2020 global biodiversity framework [DOI]
  18. 18 The local costs of establishing protected areas in low-income nations: Ranomafana National Park, Madagascar [DOI]
  19. 19 Local communities’ perceptions about the impact of protected areas on livelihoods and community development [DOI]
  20. 20 Transfrontier Conservation Areas and Human-Wildlife Conflict: The Case of the Namibian Component of the Kavango-Zambezi (KAZA) TFCA [DOI]
  21. 21 Overlooked risks and opportunities in groundwatersheds of the world’s protected areas [DOI]
  22. 22 The costs and benefits of forest protected areas for local livelihoods: a review of the current literature
  23. 23 Securing protected areas in the face of global change: issues and strategies.
  24. 24 National Parks and Protected Areas and the Role for Employment in Tourism and Forest Sectors: a Swedish Case [DOI]
  25. 25 Towards an ecohydrology-based restoration of the Usangu wetlands and the Great Ruaha River, Tanzania [DOI]
  26. 26 Protected areas, household environmental incomes and well-being in the Greater Serengeti-Mara Ecosystem [DOI]
  27. 27 Conservation, Community, and Livelihoods: Sustaining, Renewing, and Adapting Cultural Connections to the Land [DOI]
  28. 28 A roadmap for sustaining biodiversity and ecosystem services through joint conservation and restoration of northern drainage basins [DOI]
  29. 29 How does conservation land tenure affect economic impacts of wildlife: An analysis of subsistence farmers and herders in Bhutan [DOI]
  30. 30 Identifying key risks to the achievement of protected area system objectives [DOI]
  31. 31 Land-Change Science and Political Ecology: Similarities, Differences, and Implications for Sustainability Science [DOI]
  32. 32 Rural Africa at the crossroads: livelihood practices and policies.

Cited by 6

Showing 1 of 6 known citations — external sources report more than can currently be individually listed.

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

24

Page views

0

PDF downloads

2

Outbound clicks

6

Citations

Views over time

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.