Soil Fertility Responses to Different Nitrogen Application Approaches Involving Prilled Urea and Foliar Nano-urea in Wheat
Gayatri P. Turkar, H. K. Rai, A. K. Upadhyay, R. K. Sahu, S. K. Singh, Umesh Singh
Journal of Experimental Agriculture International · pp. 592–599 · Published 9 Sep 2026
10.9734/jeai/2026/v48i94493Abstract
Wheat productivity depends strongly on adequate nitrogen nutrition; however, conventional prilled urea is often associated with low nitrogen-use efficiency and substantial nutrient losses. Foliar nano-urea has emerged as a potential complementary nitrogen source that may improve nitrogen-use efficiency while reducing dependence on conventional urea. Nevertheless, information on its effects, when combined with different levels and timings of prilled urea, on post-harvest soil fertility and nutrient availability at different soil depths remains limited. A field experiment was conducted between December 2024 and April 2025 at JNKVV, Jabalpur, to investigate the effects of different nitrogen application approaches involving prilled urea and foliar nano-urea on soil fertility under wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). The randomized block design comprised nine treatments ranging from an unfertilized control and 0 N + 100% PK to combinations of reduced recommended nitrogen dose (RDN) with nano-urea sprays, alongside 100% recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF). Except in T1, 100% P2O5 and K2O were applied uniformly to all plots as basal applications. Post-harvest soil samples collected from 0–15 and 15–30 cm depths were analysed for soil organic carbon, available nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, sulphur, and DTPA-extractable zinc. The results revealed that soil pH, electrical conductivity, organic carbon, and available zinc were not significantly affected by the different combinations of prilled urea and nano-urea. Soil available nitrogen and phosphorus were significantly influenced by these combinations, with the highest available nitrogen and phosphorus under the 100% recommended dose of fertilizer (T9), which remained statistically at par with T5 and T8. The maximum available potassium and sulphur were observed under the treatment receiving 0 N + 100% PK (T2), whereas integrated application of prilled urea and nano-urea resulted in significantly lower available potassium and sulphur owing to greater nutrient uptake by the crop. Irrespective of treatment, nutrient availability was generally higher at 0–15 cm than at 15–30 cm depth. The results suggest that appropriate integration of prilled urea with foliar nano-urea maintained soil fertility comparable to the recommended fertilizer schedule, indicating that nano-urea can be effectively integrated with prilled nitrogen fertilization for sustainable wheat production.
Cited by 0
No indexed citations yet.
Related research
- Microbial Contributions in Alleviating Decline in Soil Fertility — shares topic coverage
- Correlation Analysis of Soil Nutrient Dynamics in Mulberry (Morus indica L.) Enhanced by Multi-Strain Liquid Biofertilizer Consortia for Sustainable Sericulture Development — shares topic coverage
- Effect of Biofertilization with a Mixture of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi and Natural Phosphate from Tilemsi on the Growth and Grain Yield of Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) in the Field in Koumantou — shares topic coverage
- Agronomic and Yield Characteristics of Grain Sorghum as Influenced by Environment Factors and Genotype — shares topic coverage
- Potential Role of Groundnut Stover in Soil Nutrient Management for a Sustainable Rainfed Upland Rice Production in Bimodal Rain Forest Zone of Cameroon — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
31
Page views
0
PDF downloads
4
Outbound clicks
0
Citations
Views over time
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.