Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

Assessment of Selected Laboratory Quality Management Essentials in the Haematology Department at a KENAS-Accredited Level 5 Mission Hospital in Kenya

Ian Muthomi Rugendo, Zakayo Maingi, Titus Mutwiri

Asian Hematology Research Journal · pp. 367–376 · Published 11 Jul 2026

10.9734/ahrj/2026/v9i3265

Abstract

Aims: This study assessed adherence to three selected Laboratory Quality Management System (LQMS) essentials—Process Control, Facilities and Safety, and Equipment Management—in the Haematology Department of P.C.E.A Chogoria Hospital, Kenya. Study Design: A descriptive cross-sectional study design with independent and joint assessments was used. Place and Duration: The study was conducted in the Haematology Department of Chogoria Hospital, a KENAS-accredited Level 5 mission hospital in Tharaka Nithi County, Kenya, from February to March 2026. Methodology: Census sampling covered relevant departmental staff, processes, facilities, equipment and documentation. A customised WHO SLIPTA checklist aligned with ISO 15189:2022 assessed 27 Process Control items (71 points), 24 Facilities and Safety items (57 points), and 16 Equipment Management items (37 points). Data were obtained through document review, interviews, observation and physical inspection. Compliance was scored as Yes, Partial, No or not applicable. Inter-rater reliability and Fisher's exact test were applied. Results: Process Control achieved 98.6% (70/71), Facilities and Safety 98.2% (56/57), and Equipment Management 100% (37/37). Agreement ranged from 96.3% to 100% (Gwet's AC1, 0.96–1.00). Minor gaps concerned referral technical consultant procedures and fire detection/alarm systems. Fisher's exact test showed no statistically significant difference across domains (p = 1.000). Conclusion: The department showed high compliance, although targeted corrective action is needed to address the remaining gaps.

Laboratory quality management system haematology process control acilities and safety equipment management accreditation.

Cited by 0

No indexed citations yet.

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

0

Page views

0

PDF downloads

0

Outbound clicks

0

Citations

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

No views recorded yet.

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

No traffic recorded yet.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.