Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

Research in Emotional or Behavioral Disorders: Does it Examine Study Quality and Null Results?

Mickey Losinski, John W. Maag

Journal of Education, Society and Behavioural Science · pp. 1–8 · Published 14 Jul 2018

10.9734/JESBS/2018/42940

Abstract

Two experiments were conducted to determine the extent to which interventions focused on children with, or at risk for, emotional or behavioural disorders (E/BD) could be considered as evidence-based practices. Experiment one examined the extent to which meta-analytic and systematic reviews included quality indicators as a criterion for study inclusion and whether they addressed, and accounted for, the file drawer problem. Of the 34 included systematic and meta-analytic reviews, only six addressed the quality of the included studies while only two addressed the file drawer problem as potential publication bias. Experiment two examined the extent to which three prominent journals that focus predominately on studies regarding intervention efficacy for children with, or at risk for, E/BD publish null results. Of the 215 included studies, none reported null results.  Implications for determining evidence-based practices and changing the culture of how systematic and meta-analytic reviews are conducted and the publication of only interventions studies with positive results is discussed.

Evidence-based practice emotional/behaviour disorder null results.

References (18)

  1. 1 Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test [DOI]
  2. 2 Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias [DOI]
  3. 3 The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. [DOI]
  4. 4 A Nonparametric "Trim and Fill" Method of Accounting for Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis [DOI]
  5. 5 Evidence-Based Practices and Implementation Science in Special Education [DOI]
  6. 6 A Vast Graveyard of Undead Theories [DOI]
  7. 7 A Meta-Analysis of Social Skill Interventions for Students with Emotional or Behavioral Disorders [DOI]
  8. 8 Unidentified Language Deficits in Children with Emotional and Behavioral Disorders: A Meta-Analysis [DOI]
  9. 9 Scientifically Supported Practices in Emotional and Behavioral Disorders: A Proposed Approach and Brief Review of Current Practices [DOI]
  10. 10 Unavailability of online supplementary scientific information from articles published in major journals [DOI]
  11. 11 Effectiveness of school-based prevention and intervention programs for children and adolescents with emotional disturbance: A meta-analysis [DOI]
  12. 12 Functional Assessment–Based Interventions for Students With or At-Risk for High-Incidence Disabilities: Field Testing Single-Case Synthesis Methods [DOI]
  13. 13 A Review of Self-Regulated Strategy Development for Writing for Students with EBD [DOI]
  14. 14 Persistent Issues in Behavioral Theory and Practice [DOI]
  15. 15 Meta-Analysis as a Basis for Evidence-Based Practice [DOI]
  16. 16 A Preliminary Examination to Identify the Presence of Quality Indicators in Experimental Research in Special Education [DOI]
  17. 17 Publication Bias: Recognizing the Problem, Understanding Its Origins and Scope, and Preventing Harm [DOI]
  18. 18 Editorial: A Call for Replications of Research in Pediatric Psychology and Guidance for Authors [DOI]

Cited by 0

No indexed citations yet.

Related research

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

16

Page views

0

PDF downloads

10

Outbound clicks

0

Citations

Views over time

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.