Evaluating the Comparative Efficacy of Midazolam and Clonidine as Premedication Agents: Assessing Heart Rate Response and Anti-Sialogogue Effect in Patients Undergoing General Anesthesia
Md. Aseiqur Rahaman, Sazin Islam, Mst. Rahima Arobe Akhi, Sonia Afroz Mukta, Sadia Afroz Rikta
Asian Journal of Research in Surgery · pp. 80–86 · Published 6 Jun 2023
Abstract
Aim and Objectives: The present study aimed to compare the efficacy of oral premedication with midazolam and clonidine in patients undergoing general anesthesia for various surgeries. The study evaluated the age distribution of patients, heart rate response following induction and intubation, and the anti-sialogogue effect of the two medications. Materials and Methods: This randomized, interventional, single-centered study was conducted at Sadar Hospital, District of Chuadanga, Bangladesh, from August 2022 to January 2023. A sample size of 50 patients was included, with 25 patients in each group. Age distribution analysis revealed similar patterns in both groups, with a higher concentration in the middle-age ranges. Following induction and intubation, Group M (midazolam) exhibited significantly higher heart rates compared to Group C (clonidine). Group M also had a lower incidence of dry mouth, indicating a more effective anti-sialogogue effect compared to Group C. Results: In our study, which included 50 patients divided into Group M and Group C, we found significant differences in heart rate response following induction and intubation. Group M exhibited higher heart rates compared to Group C, with mean values of 79±7.2 bpm and 78±4.7 bpm, respectively. These differences were statistically significant (p < 0.001). Moreover, the evaluation of the anti-sialogogue effect revealed that Group M had a significantly lower incidence of dry mouth compared to Group C, with only 3 patients experiencing dry mouth in Group M compared to 23 patients in Group C (p < 0.001). These results indicate that midazolam premedication leads to a stronger cardiovascular response and a more effective reduction in dry mouth symptoms compared to clonidine. These findings emphasize the importance of selecting the appropriate premedication to optimize patient outcomes during general anesthesia. Conclusion: The study highlights the importance of considering the specific premedication agents used in patients undergoing general anesthesia. While midazolam may provide better sedation and anti-sialogogue effects, it should be administered cautiously due to its impact on heart rate. Clonidine may offer advantages in terms of hemodynamic stability but may be associated with a higher incidence of dry mouth. The findings provide valuable insights for anesthesiologists in selecting appropriate premedication to optimize patient care and improve perioperative outcomes.
Cited by 0
No indexed citations yet.
Related research
- Effect of Using Midazolam and Propofol in Low Doses for Intraoperative Nausea and Vomiting Prevention in Pregnant Women Underwent Cesarean Section under Regional Anesthesia — shares topic coverage
- Evaluation of Bupivacaine Co-administration with Midazolam or Neostigmine in Pediatric Inguinal Hernia Surgery-A Randomized Clinical Trial Study — shares topic coverage
- Comparative Study on Efficacy of Intrathecal Injection Midazolam (2 mg) Versus Injection Metoclopramide IV in Prevention or Reduction of Nausea and Vomiting in Women during Caesarean Delivery under Spinal Anaesthesia — shares topic coverage
- A Review of Sedation in Paediatric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI): Preliminary Report in University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital, Rivers State, Nigeria — shares topic coverage
- Comparison of Ketamine, Clonidine, and Fentanyl as Anesthetics in the Pediatric Population: A Review of Literature — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
0
Page views
0
PDF downloads
0
Outbound clicks
0
Citations
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
No views recorded yet.
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
No traffic recorded yet.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.