Proving Medical Negligence in Nigeria: A Narrative Review of the Roles of Tribunals, Regulatory Bodies and Councils
Archives of Current Research International · pp. 310–318 · Published 7 Mar 2025
10.9734/acri/2025/v25i31121Abstract
This paper examined the roles of tribunal systems, regulatory bodies, and councils in proving medical negligence under Nigerian law. Medical negligence, a significant issue within the Nigerian healthcare system, involves the breach of professional duty resulting in patient harm. In Nigeria, medicolegal negligence remains a growing concern due to inadequate healthcare regulation, limited awareness of patients' rights, and insufficient enforcement mechanisms. The lack of comprehensive legal frameworks and the complexity of judicial processes have further compounded the difficulty in seeking redress for medical negligence cases. The paper focused on disciplinary tribunals, including the Medical and Dental Practitioners Disciplinary Tribunal and counterparts for pharmacists, medical laboratory scientists, nurses, and radiographers. These tribunals serve as quasi-judicial mechanisms to address professional misconduct. Additionally, regulatory bodies such as the Medical and Dental Council of Nigeria (MDCN), National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS), and Consumer Protection Council (CPC) are evaluated for their roles in overseeing professional conduct and addressing grievances. The paper highlighted critical challenges, including complex evidentiary requirements, procedural inefficiencies, and overlapping jurisdictions among regulatory entities. Through an in-depth analysis, the paper identified gaps in the current framework that hinder accountability and justice in medical negligence cases. It also explored interagency coordination and proposes legal, procedural, and institutional reforms to enhance efficiency and public trust. By addressing these challenges, the paper contributed to developing a robust legal and institutional framework that safeguards the rights of patients and healthcare providers. It underscored the need for a holistic approach, emphasizing collaboration among stakeholders, increased public awareness, and enhanced procedural mechanisms. The findings aim to strengthen accountability in the Nigerian healthcare system, ensuring justice for victims of medical negligence and fostering professional integrity across the sector.
Cited by 2
C. Amadi, Roy Amadi, S. Amadi · American Journal of Health Policy and Management · 2026
M. Ramdani · JURNAL ILMIAH GEMA PERENCANA · 2026
Related research
- Legal Framework for Proof of Medical Negligence in Nigeria — shares topic coverage
- Proof of Medical Negligence in Nigeria: Legal and Procedural Considerations — shares topic coverage
- Medical Negligence; the Case of the Gambia and Ghana: A Legal Commentary — shares topic coverage
- Echoes of the Past: A Needle’s Long Wait Beneath the Skin — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
14
Page views
0
PDF downloads
0
Outbound clicks
2
Citations
Views over time
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.