Skip to content
Research Article Open access

Yield and Quality Response of Chickpea to Different Sowing Dates

Md. Yeasin Ali, Parimal Kanti Biswas, Saleh Ahmed Shahriar, Saifullah Omar Nasif, Raziur Rahman Raihan

Asian Journal of Research in Crop Science · pp. 1–8 · Published 3 Jul 2018

10.9734/AJRCS/2018/41731

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at the Agronomy research field of Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University, Dhaka, Bangladesh during the period from November 2015 to June 2016 to observe the effect of sowing dates on yield and quality of chickpea. The study aimed at finding out yield and quality response of two varieties of chickpea (BARI Chola-5 and BARI Chola-9), at five different sowing dates viz. November 05, November 20, December 05, December 20 and January 04. The experiment was laid out in a split-plot design with three replications. The results of two varieties revealed significant variations in days to flowering, maturity, number of grains per plant, number of seeds per grain, the weight of 1000 seeds, grain yield, stover yield, biological yield and harvest index due to different sowing dates. Early and delayed sowings affected the chickpea yield and the quality of grain. Physiological responses of chickpea were also greatly influenced by different sowing dates that affect the proper growth and development of chickpea plants. In case of varieties, significant variation was observed in all parameters, here, BARI Chola-9 showed better performance than BARI Chola-5. BARI Chola-9 sown on November 20 produced maximum grain yield (2.40 t/ha) and the lowest grain yield (1.23 t/ha) was found in BARI Chola-5 sown on January 04. Irrespective of variety, early and delayed sowings showed lower performance on all parameters, significantly affected the yield and quality of chickpea.

Chickpea sowing dates yield and quality

Cited by 11

Producción de forraje de garbanzos Desi en diferentes fechas y densidades de siembra

Raúl Avalos-Castro, Erasmo Gutierres-Pérez, Claudia María Melgoza-Villagómez · Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas · 2025

Analysis of perspective for using chickpea seeds to produce functional food ingredients

Vladyslav Hevryk, Leonid Kaprelyants, Liudmyla Trufkati · Technology audit and production reserves · 2020

Şanlıurfa'da Tescilli Bazı Nohut (Cicer arietinum L.) Çeşitlerinin Verim, Morfolojik ve Kalite Özelliklerinin Değerlendirilmesi

Dürdane MART, Ayşe ÖKTEM, Ramazan AKIN · Türk Tarım ve Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi · 2023

Effect of cultivation method on yield, yield attributes and economics attributes of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) the semi – arid Condition of Kandahar Afghanistan

Afghanistan National Agricultural Science and Technology University, Afghanistan, Noor Mohammad Kakar, Mirza Mohammad Modasir · International Journal of Agricultural and Applied Sciences · 2022

Effect of cultivation method on yield, yield attributes and economics attributes of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L) the semi-arid Condition of Kandahar Afghanistan

Afghanistan National Agricultural Science and Technology University, Afghanistan, Mirza Mohammad Modasir, Noor Mohammad Kakar · International Journal of Agricultural and Applied Sciences · 2022

PHENOLOGY, GROWTH, AND YIELD OF CHICKPEA UNDER DIFFERENT SOWING WINDOWS AT CENTRAL REGION OF BANGLADESH

Plant Physiology Division, Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute (BARI), Gazipur-1701, A.H.M Motiur Rahman Talukder, Faruque Ahmed · Plant Physiology and Soil Chemistry · 2024

Showing 10 of 11 known citations — external sources report more than can currently be individually listed.

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

0

Page views

0

PDF downloads

0

Outbound clicks

11

Citations

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

No views recorded yet.

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

No traffic recorded yet.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.