Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

Paragraphing Strategies in Academic Writing: A Systematic Review of Structured Approaches

Chishiba, Gerald, Mukuka Joseph

Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies · pp. 160–174 · Published 11 Dec 2024

10.9734/ajess/2024/v50i121684

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to investigate the application and effectiveness of five structured paragraphing models in various academic contexts: SOFT (Statement, Opinion, Fact, Tie), CARS (Claim, Argument, Reasoning, Summary), TEEL (Main Topic, Explanation, Evidence, Link), PEEL (Point, Evidence, Explanation, Link), and PIE (Point, Illustration, Explanation). Through the analysis of 35 peer-reviewed journal publications published between 2000 and 2023, chosen based on strict inclusion and exclusion criteria, the study explores the applications of these models across a range of topic areas. A comprehensive literature review was the research approach, and both qualitative and quantitative techniques were used to assess the models' applicability, prevalence, and efficacy. Data about each model's use in various academic fields was extracted, with an emphasis on how it affects writing argumentation, coherence, and clarity. To evaluate the models' performance on academic writing assignments, the study used content analysis as a methodology. The findings showed notable variations in how these models were used across fields and academic levels. While more complicated models like PEEL and CARS were more frequently used in disciplines like political science, law, and the humanities where well-structured argumentation is essential, basic models like PIE were mostly utilised in high school and first-year university courses. The study also found that TEEL was preferred in undergraduate and graduate expository and analytical writing, whereas the SOFT model was more common in technical, business, and economics topics since it placed a strong focus on presenting factual facts. The study found that every model had unique benefits and drawbacks. The PIE model is praised for its simplicity, yet it is shallow for complex reasoning. Even while PEEL's formulaic format has drawn criticism, its explicit link between argument and evidence has earned it respect. CARS is a good way to create research space. The study suggests that teachers use structured paragraphing in a methodical manner, beginning with straightforward models such as PIE and working their way up to more intricate models like PEEL and CARS.

Structured paragraphing models PIE PEEL TEEL CARS SOFT academic writing education writing skills

Cited by 0

No indexed citations yet.

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

0

Page views

0

PDF downloads

0

Outbound clicks

0

Citations

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

No views recorded yet.

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

No traffic recorded yet.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.