Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

Open VS Closed Techniques for Laparoscopic Abdominal Surgeries

Obaid Ul Haseeb, Haris Rashid, Afrin Ahmed, Mir Arsalan Ali, Shakil Alam, Santosh Kumar Sidhwani, Fatima Zehra Khan

Journal of Pharmaceutical Research International · pp. 296–302 · Published 13 Dec 2021

10.9734/jpri/2021/v33i54B33789

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic surgery or "minimally invasive" surgery is a type of specialist surgery. The most crucial, demanding, and risky part of the laparoscopy is the creation of pneumoperitoneum. The two most prevalent methods for creating a pneumoperitoneum are the closed and open approaches. Despite the fact that there is no universal consensus on the best approach to gain access to the peritoneal cavity in order to create a pneumoperitoneum. The aim of present study was to compare the operative time and post-operative outcome associated with closed technique and open classic technique. Methods: This randomized controlled trial was carried out by recruiting patients presented in surgery department of Ziauddin Hospital North campus. The samples were divided into two equal groups A and B. Group A was operated for Laparascopic abdominal surgery by open technique while group B operated through closed technique. Effectiveness of procedures was measured by number of complications occurred during and after surgery. Chi-square test and independent T-test were applied for association. P-value of < 0.05 was considered as significant. Results: Mean age was found to be 45.5±16 years and mean weight was 68±10.5 kilograms. Mean time of operations was 84.5±18.5 minutes. 60 (69.8%) of patients included underwent the laparoscopic cholecystectomy while 15 (17.4%) patients had laparoscopic appendectomy. 13/86: 15.1% of patients had the minor complication including 12/43: 27.9% in group B and 1/43: 2.3% in group A. The comparative analysis between the two groups in terms of effectiveness of either method compared by means of development of the complications was found to be highly significant with p value 0.002. Conclusion: The open approach to laparoscopic entrance has been linked to fewer surgical problems than the closed approach.

Open techniques closed technique laparoscopic hasson technique palmer’s point technique

References (11)

  1. 1 Complications of laparoscopy: An inquiry about closed- versus open-entry technique [DOI]
  2. 2 Complications of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Our Experience from a Retrospective Analysis [DOI]
  3. 3 Laparoscopic Suturing as a Barrier to Broader Adoption of Laparoscopic Surgery [DOI]
  4. 4 Complications Of Laparoscopy [DOI]
  5. 5 Advances in laparoscopic surgery in urology [DOI]
  6. 6 Diagnostic laparoscopy in penetrating abdominal trauma [DOI]
  7. 7 Open laparoscopy as a method of access in laparoscopic surgery [DOI]
  8. 8 Role of laparoscopic ultrasound during diagnostic laparoscopy for proximal biliary cancers: a single series of 100 patients [DOI]
  9. 9 Combination of Preoperative Progressive Pneumoperitoneum and Botulinum Toxin A Enables the Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Approach for Repairing Giant Inguinoscrotal Hernias [DOI]
  10. 10 Rigid endoscopy: laparoscopy [DOI]
  11. 11 Comparison of Direct Trocar versus Veress Needle Insertion in Creation of Pneumoperitoneum in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Cited by 0

No indexed citations yet.

Related research

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

0

Page views

0

PDF downloads

0

Outbound clicks

0

Citations

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

No views recorded yet.

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

No traffic recorded yet.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.