Skip to content
Research Article Open access

Response of Chickpea Varieties to Different Irrigation Regimes

M. H. Ali

Asian Journal of Advances in Agricultural Research · pp. 1–7 · Published 20 Sep 2017

10.9734/AJAAR/2017/35861

Abstract

Chickpea is an important pulse crop in Bangladesh. The study was conducted at BINA sub-station Magura, to evaluate the yield potential of new cultivars of chickpea under different irrigation regimes. The experimental design was RCBD (with split-plot) having irrigation treatments in the main plots and chickpea varieties in the sub-plots. The irrigation treatments comprised of: control (no irrigation) [T1], irrigation at vegetative stage (25-30 DAS) [T2], irrigation at flowering stage (45-50 DAS) [T3], and irrigation at vegetative stage (25-30 DAS) and flowering stage (45-50 DAS) [T4]. The varieties were: V1 = Binasola-5; V2 = Binasola-6 and V3 = Binasola-4. Irrigation water was applied up to field capacity as per treatment. The results revealed that irrigation treatments had detrimental effect on all yield attributes (plant height, seed per pod, branch per plant) and seed yield. The seed yield gradually reduced when irrigation was applied. The highest seed yield (1.87 t ha-1) was obtained from control treatment which received no irrigation. The varieties had also significant effect on all yield attributes and seed yield. The cultivar binasola-5 produced the highest yield (1.20 t ha-1). The highest water use efficiency (263.01 kg ha-1 cm-1) was also found in control treatment (T1), which received no irrigation. From the results of the study, it is revealed that under the prevailing climatic and soil condition, the chickpea cultivars do not need any irrigation at Magura, rather it reduces yield.

Chickpea irrigation water productivity water stress

Cited by 4

Comparative analysis of chickpea with boro rice in drought-prone areas of Bangladesh

ST Siddique, M Kamruzzaman, SC Sharna · International Journal of Agricultural Research, Innovation and Technology · 2021

YIELD OF CHICKPEAS SOWN AT DIFFERENT TIMES

RAMON IVO SOARES AVELAR, CÂNDIDO ALVES DA COSTA, FERNANDO DA SILVA ROCHA · Revista Caatinga · 2018

Water productivity of major pulses – A review

Lala I.P. Ray, K. Swetha, A.K. Singh · Agricultural Water Management · 2023

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

0

Page views

0

PDF downloads

0

Outbound clicks

4

Citations

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

No views recorded yet.

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

No traffic recorded yet.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.