On the Non-Relativistic Space-Time View and the Covariation of Maxwell's Equations

Abstract

Based on the discussion of Maxwell's equations (ME) and the comparison between the non-relativistic view of time and space and the special theory of relativity (SR), this paper weaved a picture of physical theory breaking the conventional twists and turns. For a long time, many physicists have labeled the classical electromagnetic theory with ME at its core "relativistic electromagnetism." However, 200 years of theoretical and experimental progress have made electromagnetism stand out without the approval of relativity. H. Lorentz insisted that the theory of the existence of ether was correct, and that it was fundamentally different from SR. In this paper, Lorentz relativity is considered superior to Einstein Relativity. The so-called Lorentz transform (LT) has played a historic role in the development of physical theories. However, we are against the one-sided emphasis on the absolute requirement of "physical laws on LT covariation". It is wrong to regard it as an iron law that cannot be violated. Current scientific development has shown that one should not despise and ignore the time-space view based on Galilei transform (GT), so called Generalized GT (i.e. GGT) has shown its value today. In this paper, physical vacuum is proposed as the main option of "new ether". It emphasizes that quantum non-locality is a non-relativistic view of time and space and has been successful. It emphasizes the possibility of superluminal motion and suggests the establishment of "Superluminal Light Physics" as a new discipline. This paper makes a sharp criticism on Einstein's SR theory and viewpoint, which can be used for reference. This paper also say that the 2022 Nobel prize in physics has been awarded to A. Aspect et al. it sent shock waves through the physical world. The Einstein's local realism did not correct, and Einstein's thought logically difinable causalily for quantum non-locality to resolve the EPR paradox. But in this situation, the problems still exist. For example, is quantum entanglement necessity logical or purely statistical?