Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

Developing a New Teaching Paradigm for the 21st Century Learners in the Context of Socratic Methodologies

Horace Crogman, Maryam Trebeau Crogman, Laurelle Warner, Ana Mustafa, Raul Peters

Journal of Education, Society and Behavioural Science · pp. 62–95 · Published 22 May 2015

10.9734/BJESBS/2015/17825

Abstract

Issue: The ever-growing plethora of teaching methodologies in the past decade has only confused and scattered the focus of the learners and teaching curricula. Though education’s progress claimed offering ways to educate more equally, weak students are still far apart and neglected. Aim: Shifting landscape technology has provided a unique opportunity for various proven pedagogic methodologies to be combined in such a way as to enhance and improve student learning, and closing the achievement gap. We developed and implemented a teaching paradigm that allows educators to connect with learners through an inquiry-based learning framework where the practitioner flexibly bridges and moves between enhanced Socratic and Didactive teaching methodologies throughout instruction, and uses simple methods to assess weaknesses, group students and improve their academic outcome. Method: Our method was implemented in college science classes over the course of 5 years. Students were tracked on their progress and gaps between the weakest and the strongest students were assessed before and after implementation of the method. Results: The use of the Pseudo-Socratic teaching (PST) methodology demonstrated improvement in students’ learning and more importantly a decrease of the gap between the weakest and strongest students in the classroom. Conclusion: Our PST method is accessible and adaptable to the various disciplines. We demonstrated that the majority of the success in a classroom does not depend on who are the students, their background, or their performance levels, but relies on flexible, approachable, and organized practitioners who excite the critical thinking skills and curiosity of their learners, connect with them, become their friendly guide, and keeps high hopes and expectations in the context of Inquiry-based and socratic learning.

Critical-thinking interactive classroom achievement gap inquiry-based learning Socratic didactive student learning student success peer-group learning connectivity comfortability organization and preparedness.

Cited by 13

Holistic Heritage of Ancient India: Guiding Principles for Present Education

Gyanendra Singh, Raj Singh, Kushagri Singh · Research Review Journal of Indian Knowledge Systems · 2025

Inquiry skills teaching and its relationship with UAE secondary school students’ critical thinking: Systematic review of science teachers’ perspectives

Othman Abu Khurma, Farah El Zein · Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education · 2024

Generated questions learning model (GQLM): Beyond learning styles

Horace Crogman, Maryam Trebeau Crogman · Cogent Education · 2016

Ungrading: The Case for Abandoning Institutionalized Assessment Protocols and Improving Pedagogical Strategies

Horace T. Crogman, Kwame O. Eshun, Maury Jackson · Education Sciences · 2023

Unshackling Learning

Horace Crogman, Maury Jackson · Integrated Science · 2022

Modified generated question learning, and its classroom implementation and assessment

Horace Crogman, Maryam Trebeau Crogman · Cogent Education · 2018

Virtual Reality, Augmented Reality, and Mixed Reality in Experiential Learning: Transforming Educational Paradigms

Horace T. Crogman, Victor D. Cano, Edlyn Pacheco · Education Sciences · 2025

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

0

Page views

0

PDF downloads

0

Outbound clicks

13

Citations

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

No views recorded yet.

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

No traffic recorded yet.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.