Non-invasive Assessment of the Severity of Aortic Stenosis by Doppler Derived Aortic Valve Coefficient: A Retrospective Feasibility Study in Humans
Anup K. Paul, Mohamed A. Effat, Jason J. Paquin, Arumugam Narayanan, Tarek A. Helmy, Imran Arif, Massoud A. Leesar, Rupak K. Banerjee
Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research · pp. 177–191 · Published 20 Apr 2015
10.9734/BJMMR/2015/17136Abstract
Background: Accurate assessment of the severity of stenosis is critical in patients with aortic stenosis. The ambiguities and imprecisions of the current diagnostic parameters can result in sub-optimal clinical decisions. In this feasibility study, we investigate the functional diagnostic parameter AVC (Aortic Valve coefficient: ratio of the total transvalvular pressure drop to the proximal dynamic pressure) in the non-invasive assessment of the severity of aortic stenosis by correlating with the current diagnostic parameters. Methods and Results: AVC was calculated using Doppler measured diagnostic parameters obtained from retrospective chart reviews. A theoretical pressure recovery correction was applied to the pressure drop calculated from Doppler measurements to obtain AVC. A statistically significant and strong combined linear correlation (r = 0.93, p<0.001) of AVC with the transvalvular pressure drop and the left ventricular outflow tract velocity was observed. The mean values of AVC were shown to better delineate moderate and severe stenosis (54% difference) than the mean values of Doppler measured pressure drop and aortic valve area (22% and 25% difference, respectively), when the patients were categorized based on the catheterization measured pressure drop. Conclusion: The feasibility of using pressure and flow measurements obtained from Doppler measurements in a single combined diagnostic index for the assessment of aortic stenosis severity has been evaluated. The nondimensional clinical parameter, AVC, is expected to account for the variation in flow and pressure drop and thus improve the delineation of different grades of aortic stenosis. AVC must be further evaluated in a controlled prospective study.
Cited by 2
Shreyash M. Manegaonkar, Rishi Sukhija, M. Effat · Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine · 2024
Gavin A. D’Souza, R. Banerjee, M. Taylor · Journal of Biomechanics · 2018
Related research
- The Impact of Age in Prosthesis-patient Mismatch on Long-term Survival after Aortic Valve Replacement: in-vitro versus in-vivo Values — shares topic coverage
- Early Mobilization is the Key towards Early Functional Independence in a Patient Undergone Aortic Valve Replacement: A Case Study — shares topic coverage
- Effect of an Increase in Global Left Ventricular Afterload on Myocardial Deformation in Patients with Aortic Stenosis, Comparison with Hypertensive Patients — shares topic coverage
- Hypercholesterolemia Familial: Early Cardiovascular Complications, Treatment Challenges, and the Fatal Consequences of Delayed Diagnosis: an in-Depth Case Study — shares topic coverage
- Characteristic and Pattern of Aortic Stenosis: An Observational Study in a Designated Population of Patients — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
0
Page views
0
PDF downloads
0
Outbound clicks
2
Citations
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
No views recorded yet.
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
No traffic recorded yet.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.