Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

Retained T-tube after CBD Exploration Extracted Laparoscopically: A Case Report

Arun Kumar Mohanty, Sujit Kumar Mohanty, Ramapada Mohapatra, Suraj Ethiraj

Asian Journal of Case Reports in Surgery · pp. 362–365 · Published 25 Oct 2022

Abstract

Introduction: T-tube has long been used to drain the biliary tract after choledochotomy. It is generally removed 10-14 days after the surgery by means of gentle traction. Here we report a rare cause of retained T-tube due to plastering and peritonialisation of the tube to the parietal wall. Case Report: A 45 year old lady with choledocholithiasis was planned for common bile duct (CBD) exploration and stone extraction after a failed ERCP. After the procedure a T-tube drain was placed in the CBD. On post operative day 21, the tube was unable to be removed despite traction. Patient was planned for a diagnostic laparoscopy which revealed that the T-tube was plastered and peritonialised completely along its tract to the parietal wall causing its retention. The tube was dissected from the sheath formed around and gently extracted uneventfully. The patient was later doing fine on regular follow up. Conclusion: Although T-tube placement after choledochotomy is a common surgical practice, the complications of retained T-tube is less understood. Defining the various causes of retained T-tube helps in handling such complications.

T-tube CBD Exploration laparoscopy cholecystectomy choledocholithiasis

Cited by 0

No indexed citations yet.

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

0

Page views

0

PDF downloads

0

Outbound clicks

0

Citations

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

No views recorded yet.

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

No traffic recorded yet.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.